PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WIMI vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WIMI vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WiMi Hologram Cloud Inc. (WIMI) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WIMI vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
WIMI
WiMi Hologram Cloud Inc.
-19.41%-87.19%128.40%9.47%-75.66%-47.22%4.73%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
-17.87%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%335.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WIMI achieves a -19.41% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's -17.87% return.


WIMI

1D
-0.52%
1M
3.80%
YTD
-19.41%
6M
-59.45%
1Y
-77.69%
3Y*
-43.87%
5Y*
-50.82%
10Y*

TQQQ

1D
3.72%
1M
-12.88%
YTD
-17.87%
6M
-17.28%
1Y
48.52%
3Y*
46.87%
5Y*
13.55%
10Y*
35.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WIMI vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WIMI
WIMI Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
WIMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WIMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
WIMI Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
WIMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
WIMI Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WIMI vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WiMi Hologram Cloud Inc. (WIMI) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WIMITQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.82

0.72

-1.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.45

1.41

-2.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.20

-0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.97

1.41

-2.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.25

4.28

-5.53

WIMI vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WIMI Sharpe Ratio is -0.82, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WIMI and TQQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WIMITQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.82

0.72

-1.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.46

0.20

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.27

0.65

-0.91

Correlation

The correlation between WIMI and TQQQ is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

WIMI vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

WIMI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WIMI
WiMi Hologram Cloud Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.73%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Drawdowns

WIMI vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WIMI drawdown since its inception was -99.35%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WIMI and TQQQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WIMITQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.35%

-81.66%

-17.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-82.61%

-36.97%

-45.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.59%

-81.66%

-15.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.23%

-28.08%

-71.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-87.46%

-18.66%

-68.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

64.41%

12.13%

+52.28%

Volatility

WIMI vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

WiMi Hologram Cloud Inc. (WIMI) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) have volatilities of 20.16% and 19.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WIMITQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.16%

19.74%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.72%

38.50%

+15.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

95.80%

67.35%

+28.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

112.03%

66.53%

+45.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

162.12%

65.83%

+96.29%