PortfoliosLab logo
WGS vs. VST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between WGS and VST is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

WGS vs. VST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) and Vistra Corp. (VST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

WGS:

1.70

VST:

0.63

Sortino Ratio

WGS:

2.69

VST:

1.51

Omega Ratio

WGS:

1.37

VST:

1.21

Calmar Ratio

WGS:

2.11

VST:

1.38

Martin Ratio

WGS:

13.87

VST:

3.11

Ulcer Index

WGS:

14.89%

VST:

21.71%

Daily Std Dev

WGS:

114.04%

VST:

74.99%

Max Drawdown

WGS:

-99.85%

VST:

-53.32%

Current Drawdown

WGS:

-93.06%

VST:

-29.13%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WGS:

$1.92B

VST:

$47.38B

EPS

WGS:

-$1.39

VST:

$7.01

PS Ratio

WGS:

5.81

VST:

2.71

PB Ratio

WGS:

7.45

VST:

15.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

WGS:

$330.14M

VST:

$14.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WGS:

$211.05M

VST:

$6.69B

EBITDA (TTM)

WGS:

-$20.55M

VST:

$6.21B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WGS achieves a -23.05% return, which is significantly lower than VST's -1.37% return.


WGS

YTD

-23.05%

1M

-39.21%

6M

-23.98%

1Y

191.04%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

VST

YTD

-1.37%

1M

15.02%

6M

-4.01%

1Y

46.92%

5Y*

52.20%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

WGS vs. VST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WGS is 9494
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WGS is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WGS is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WGS is 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WGS is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WGS is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

VST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VST is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VST is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VST is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VST is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VST is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VST is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WGS vs. VST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) and Vistra Corp. (VST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current WGS Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the VST Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WGS and VST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

WGS vs. VST - Dividend Comparison

WGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%.


TTM202420232022202120202019201820172016
WGS
GeneDx Holdings Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VST
Vistra Corp.
0.65%0.63%2.13%3.12%2.64%2.75%2.17%0.00%0.00%14.97%

Drawdowns

WGS vs. VST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WGS drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, which is greater than VST's maximum drawdown of -53.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGS and VST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

WGS vs. VST - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

WGS vs. VST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GeneDx Holdings Corp. and Vistra Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00BJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
87.12M
4.04B
(WGS) Total Revenue
(VST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WGS vs. VST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between GeneDx Holdings Corp. and Vistra Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%JulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
67.1%
39.6%
(WGS) Gross Margin
(VST) Gross Margin
WGS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 58.48M and revenue of 87.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.1%.

VST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Vistra Corp. reported a gross profit of 1.60B and revenue of 4.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.

WGS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of -4.55M and revenue of 87.12M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.2%.

VST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Vistra Corp. reported an operating income of 599.00M and revenue of 4.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.8%.

WGS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, GeneDx Holdings Corp. reported a net income of -6.53M and revenue of 87.12M, resulting in a net margin of -7.5%.

VST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Vistra Corp. reported a net income of 441.00M and revenue of 4.04B, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.