WGO vs. POOL
WGO (Winnebago Industries, Inc.) and POOL (Pool Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — WGO in Recreational Vehicles, POOL in Leisure. Over the past 10 years, WGO returned 4.86%/yr vs 7.60%/yr for POOL. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
WGO vs. POOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WGO achieves a -22.96% return, which is significantly lower than POOL's -17.72% return. Over the past 10 years, WGO has underperformed POOL with an annualized return of 4.86%, while POOL has yielded a comparatively higher 7.60% annualized return.
WGO
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- 6M
- -32.53%
- YTD
- -22.96%
- 1Y
- 9.32%
- 3Y*
- -21.39%
- 5Y*
- -13.76%
- 10Y*
- 4.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.27%
POOL
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- -15.38%
- 6M
- -25.93%
- YTD
- -17.72%
- 1Y
- -38.49%
- 3Y*
- -20.44%
- 5Y*
- -16.09%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
POOL Pool Corporation | $220.41M | $177.95M | $201.61M |
| $14.62M | $18.55M | $22.13M |
WGO vs. POOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WGO Winnebago Industries, Inc. | -22.96% | -11.86% | -33.08% | 40.87% | -28.69% | 25.97% | 14.19% | 121.91% | -56.04% | 77.77% |
POOL Pool Corporation | -17.72% | -31.81% | -13.39% | 33.51% | -46.03% | 52.98% | 76.95% | 44.50% | 15.97% | 25.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between WGO and POOL is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 1995 | 0.35 |
The correlation between WGO and POOL shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.51 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WGO:
$855.98M
POOL:
$6.77B
WGO:
$1.36
POOL:
$10.88
WGO:
22.30
POOL:
17.07
WGO:
0.30
POOL:
1.27
WGO:
0.70
POOL:
5.35
WGO:
$2.84B
POOL:
$5.39B
WGO:
$368.70M
POOL:
$1.60B
WGO:
$113.40M
POOL:
$605.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WGO vs. POOL — Risk / Return Rank
WGO
POOL
WGO vs. POOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Winnebago Industries, Inc. (WGO) and Pool Corporation (POOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WGO | POOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.81 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | -0.82 | +0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.25 | -1.30 | +1.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WGO vs. POOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WGO drawdown since its inception was -91.48%, which is greater than POOL's maximum drawdown of -75.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGO and POOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WGO | POOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.48% | -75.71% | -15.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.04% | -46.86% | +2.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.53% | -56.77% | -3.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.01% | -67.85% | +6.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.12% | -67.85% | +0.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.71% | -65.70% | +4.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.77% | -18.55% | -22.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.76% | 29.57% | -4.81% |
Volatility
WGO vs. POOL - Volatility Comparison
Winnebago Industries, Inc. (WGO) has a higher volatility of 12.36% compared to Pool Corporation (POOL) at 11.43%. This indicates that WGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WGO | POOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.36% | 11.43% | +0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.81% | 29.08% | +0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.28% | 34.85% | +17.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.80% | 34.45% | +10.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.98% | 31.85% | +17.13% |
Dividends
WGO vs. POOL - Dividend Comparison
WGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than POOL's 2.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POOL Pool Corporation | 2.72% | 2.16% | 1.38% | 1.08% | 1.26% | 0.53% | 0.61% | 0.99% | 1.16% | 1.10% | 1.14% | 1.24% |
WGO Winnebago Industries, Inc. | 4.62% | 3.38% | 2.66% | 1.54% | 1.54% | 0.72% | 0.75% | 0.83% | 1.65% | 0.72% | 1.26% | 1.86% |
Financials
WGO vs. POOL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Winnebago Industries, Inc. and Pool Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WGO vs. POOL - Profitability Comparison
WGO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Winnebago Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 94.90M and revenue of 698.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.6%.
POOL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pool Corporation reported a gross profit of 540.76M and revenue of 1.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.7%.
WGO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Winnebago Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.00M and revenue of 698.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.
POOL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pool Corporation reported an operating income of 267.68M and revenue of 1.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.7%.
WGO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Winnebago Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 14.50M and revenue of 698.70M, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.
POOL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pool Corporation reported a net income of 188.09M and revenue of 1.82B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WGO and POOL have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WGO has higher volatility (12.36%) compared to POOL (11.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGO dropped -91.48% vs POOL's -75.71%.
WGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WGO and POOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer