WGO vs. LCII
WGO (Winnebago Industries, Inc.) and LCII (LCI Industries) are both stocks. Both operate in the Recreational Vehicles industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 10 years, WGO returned 4.24%/yr vs 4.47%/yr for LCII. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WGO vs. LCII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WGO achieves a -24.80% return, which is significantly lower than LCII's -14.24% return. Over the past 10 years, WGO has underperformed LCII with an annualized return of 4.24%, while LCII has yielded a comparatively higher 4.47% annualized return.
WGO
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 1.09%
- 6M
- -31.90%
- YTD
- -24.80%
- 1Y
- -7.66%
- 3Y*
- -22.00%
- 5Y*
- -12.33%
- 10Y*
- 4.24%
LCII
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 9.65%
- 6M
- -20.59%
- YTD
- -14.24%
- 1Y
- 6.07%
- 3Y*
- -4.10%
- 5Y*
- -1.59%
- 10Y*
- 4.47%
WGO vs. LCII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WGO Winnebago Industries, Inc. | -24.80% | -11.86% | -33.08% | 40.87% | -28.69% | 25.97% | 14.19% | 121.91% | -56.04% | 77.77% |
LCII LCI Industries | -14.24% | 22.83% | -14.64% | 41.10% | -38.49% | 23.07% | 24.13% | 65.13% | -47.23% | 23.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between WGO and LCII is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 1989 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, WGO and LCII have become more correlated (0.70) than their long-term average of 0.39, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
WGO:
$835.63M
LCII:
$2.48B
WGO:
$1.36
LCII:
$7.71
WGO:
21.77
LCII:
13.23
WGO:
8.03
LCII:
0.48
WGO:
0.30
LCII:
0.60
WGO:
0.68
LCII:
1.83
WGO:
$2.84B
LCII:
$4.12B
WGO:
$368.70M
LCII:
$980.30M
WGO:
$113.40M
LCII:
$381.13M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WGO vs. LCII — Risk / Return Rank
WGO
LCII
WGO vs. LCII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Winnebago Industries, Inc. (WGO) and LCI Industries (LCII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WGO | LCII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.06 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 0.15 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.33 | 0.34 | -0.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WGO vs. LCII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WGO drawdown since its inception was -91.48%, roughly equal to the maximum LCII drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGO and LCII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WGO | LCII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.48% | -87.55% | -3.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.04% | -41.76% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.53% | -41.76% | -18.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.01% | -47.19% | -13.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.12% | -53.89% | -13.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.64% | -33.77% | -27.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.75% | -25.28% | -15.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.31% | 18.01% | +5.30% |
Volatility
WGO vs. LCII - Volatility Comparison
Winnebago Industries, Inc. (WGO) has a higher volatility of 16.58% compared to LCI Industries (LCII) at 11.25%. This indicates that WGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WGO | LCII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.58% | 11.25% | +5.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.62% | 28.44% | +1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.74% | 36.07% | +16.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.78% | 39.37% | +5.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.93% | 39.90% | +9.03% |
Dividends
WGO vs. LCII - Dividend Comparison
WGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, more than LCII's 4.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCII LCI Industries | 4.51% | 3.79% | 4.16% | 3.34% | 4.38% | 2.21% | 2.16% | 2.38% | 3.52% | 1.58% | 1.30% | 3.28% |
WGO Winnebago Industries, Inc. | 4.74% | 3.38% | 2.66% | 1.54% | 1.54% | 0.72% | 0.75% | 0.83% | 1.65% | 0.72% | 1.26% | 1.86% |
Financials
WGO vs. LCII - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Winnebago Industries, Inc. and LCI Industries. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WGO vs. LCII - Profitability Comparison
WGO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Winnebago Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 94.90M and revenue of 698.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.6%.
LCII - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, LCI Industries reported a gross profit of 205.91M and revenue of 932.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.1%.
WGO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Winnebago Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.00M and revenue of 698.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.
LCII - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, LCI Industries reported an operating income of 35.36M and revenue of 932.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.
WGO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Winnebago Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 14.50M and revenue of 698.70M, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.
LCII - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, LCI Industries reported a net income of 18.68M and revenue of 932.70M, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WGO and LCII have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WGO has higher volatility (16.58%) compared to LCII (11.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGO dropped -91.48% vs LCII's -87.55%.
LCII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.17 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WGO and LCII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer