WGO vs. CWH

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Winnebago Industries, Inc. (WGO) and Camping World Holdings, Inc. (CWH).

Performance

WGO vs. CWH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Winnebago Industries, Inc. (WGO) and Camping World Holdings, Inc. (CWH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WGO vs. CWH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WGO Winnebago Industries, Inc.	-22.93%	-11.86%	-33.08%	40.87%	-28.69%	25.97%	14.19%	121.91%	-56.04%	77.77%
CWH Camping World Holdings, Inc.	-29.80%	-52.24%	-17.93%	25.13%	-39.63%	61.88%	90.21%	35.35%	-73.62%	40.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap WGO : $883.22M CWH : $428.40M
EPS WGO : $1.47 CWH : $5.51
PE Ratio WGO : 21.12 CWH : 1.24
PEG Ratio WGO : 7.79 CWH : 0.01
PS Ratio WGO : 0.30 CWH : 0.07
PB Ratio WGO : 0.43 CWH : 1.87
Total Revenue (TTM) WGO : $2.91B CWH : $6.37B
Gross Profit (TTM) WGO : $379.80M CWH : $1.88B
EBITDA (TTM) WGO : $121.70M CWH : $545.79M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WGO achieves a -22.93% return, which is significantly higher than CWH's -29.80% return.

WGO

• 1D: -1.77%
• 1M: -22.31%
• YTD: -22.93%
• 6M: -6.62%
• 1Y: -6.49%
• 3Y*: -16.50%
• 5Y*: -15.36%
• 10Y*: 5.02%

CWH

• 1D: 3.80%
• 1M: -17.91%
• YTD: -29.80%
• 6M: -56.22%
• 1Y: -56.61%
• 3Y*: -29.01%
• 5Y*: -25.08%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

WGO vs. CWH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WGO

WGO Risk / Return Rank: 36
WGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
WGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
WGO Omega Ratio Rank: 35
WGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
WGO Martin Ratio Rank: 34

CWH

CWH Risk / Return Rank: 9
CWH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
CWH Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
CWH Omega Ratio Rank: 11
CWH Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
CWH Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WGO vs. CWH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Winnebago Industries, Inc. (WGO) and Camping World Holdings, Inc. (CWH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WGO	CWH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.11	-0.79	+0.67
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.26	-1.01	+1.27
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	0.87	+0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.19	-0.83	+0.64
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.52	-1.83	+1.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WGO vs. CWH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WGO Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is higher than the CWH Sharpe Ratio of -0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WGO and CWH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WGO	CWH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11	-0.79	+0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.35	-0.47	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	-0.13	+0.23

Correlation

The correlation between WGO and CWH is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

WGO vs. CWH - Dividend Comparison

WGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, less than CWH's 5.49% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WGO Winnebago Industries, Inc.	4.45%	3.38%	2.66%	1.54%	1.54%	0.72%	0.75%	0.83%	1.65%	0.72%	1.26%	1.86%
CWH Camping World Holdings, Inc.	5.49%	5.14%	2.37%	5.71%	11.20%	4.28%	5.67%	4.16%	5.34%	1.66%	0.25%	0.00%

Drawdowns

WGO vs. CWH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WGO drawdown since its inception was -91.48%, roughly equal to the maximum CWH drawdown of -90.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGO and CWH.

Drawdown Indicators

	WGO	CWH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.48%	-90.83%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.83%	-69.05%	+31.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.62%	-84.72%	+21.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-60.69%	-82.00%	+21.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.62%	-40.51%	-0.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.96%	31.31%	-17.35%

Volatility

WGO vs. CWH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Winnebago Industries, Inc. (WGO) is 11.53%, while Camping World Holdings, Inc. (CWH) has a volatility of 22.51%. This indicates that WGO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WGO	CWH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.53%	22.51%	-10.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.98%	54.49%	-14.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.86%	71.97%	-15.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.59%	53.60%	-9.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.68%	62.16%	-13.48%

Financials

WGO vs. CWH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Winnebago Industries, Inc. and Camping World Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

WGO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Winnebago Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 85.60M and revenue of 657.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.0%.

CWH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Camping World Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 338.24M and revenue of 1.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.8%.

WGO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Winnebago Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 11.80M and revenue of 657.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.8%.

CWH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Camping World Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -50.05M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in an operating margin of -4.3%.

WGO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Winnebago Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 4.80M and revenue of 657.40M, resulting in a net margin of 0.7%.

CWH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Camping World Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 368.46M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in a net margin of 31.4%.