PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
WFRPX vs. TLH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between WFRPX and TLH is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

WFRPX vs. TLH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wealthfront Risk Parity Fund Class W (WFRPX) and iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-6.76%
-4.53%
WFRPX
TLH

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

WFRPX:

0.20

TLH:

0.27

Sortino Ratio

WFRPX:

0.34

TLH:

0.45

Omega Ratio

WFRPX:

1.05

TLH:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

WFRPX:

0.08

TLH:

0.08

Martin Ratio

WFRPX:

0.48

TLH:

0.57

Ulcer Index

WFRPX:

4.43%

TLH:

5.26%

Daily Std Dev

WFRPX:

10.64%

TLH:

11.14%

Max Drawdown

WFRPX:

-42.76%

TLH:

-41.14%

Current Drawdown

WFRPX:

-23.91%

TLH:

-31.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WFRPX achieves a -0.39% return, which is significantly lower than TLH's 2.76% return.


WFRPX

YTD

-0.39%

1M

0.00%

6M

-6.76%

1Y

1.37%

5Y*

-5.33%

10Y*

N/A

TLH

YTD

2.76%

1M

2.73%

6M

-4.53%

1Y

3.29%

5Y*

-5.03%

10Y*

-0.48%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WFRPX vs. TLH - Expense Ratio Comparison

WFRPX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than TLH's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


WFRPX
Wealthfront Risk Parity Fund Class W
Expense ratio chart for WFRPX: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%
Expense ratio chart for TLH: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

WFRPX vs. TLH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFRPX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WFRPX is 1212
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WFRPX is 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WFRPX is 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WFRPX is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WFRPX is 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WFRPX is 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

TLH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TLH is 1111
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TLH is 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TLH is 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TLH is 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TLH is 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TLH is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WFRPX vs. TLH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wealthfront Risk Parity Fund Class W (WFRPX) and iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for WFRPX, currently valued at 0.20, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.200.27
The chart of Sortino ratio for WFRPX, currently valued at 0.34, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.340.45
The chart of Omega ratio for WFRPX, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.051.05
The chart of Calmar ratio for WFRPX, currently valued at 0.08, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.080.08
The chart of Martin ratio for WFRPX, currently valued at 0.48, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.000.480.57
WFRPX
TLH

The current WFRPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is comparable to the TLH Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFRPX and TLH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.20
0.27
WFRPX
TLH

Dividends

WFRPX vs. TLH - Dividend Comparison

WFRPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%, more than TLH's 4.18% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
WFRPX
Wealthfront Risk Parity Fund Class W
5.20%5.18%4.86%1.31%0.00%0.29%1.57%1.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLH
iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.18%4.28%3.83%2.78%1.50%2.65%2.31%2.17%1.83%1.91%2.13%2.12%

Drawdowns

WFRPX vs. TLH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFRPX drawdown since its inception was -42.76%, roughly equal to the maximum TLH drawdown of -41.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFRPX and TLH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-23.91%
-31.92%
WFRPX
TLH

Volatility

WFRPX vs. TLH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wealthfront Risk Parity Fund Class W (WFRPX) is 0.00%, while iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) has a volatility of 3.12%. This indicates that WFRPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February0
3.12%
WFRPX
TLH
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab