WFRD vs. OLMA
WFRD (Weatherford International plc) and OLMA (Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) are both stocks. WFRD operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while OLMA operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, WFRD returned 38.93%/yr vs -13.38%/yr for OLMA. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
WFRD vs. OLMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WFRD achieves a 12.77% return, which is significantly higher than OLMA's -54.20% return.
WFRD
- 1D
- 3.64%
- 1M
- 5.76%
- 6M
- -6.19%
- YTD
- 12.77%
- 1Y
- 62.48%
- 3Y*
- 2.38%
- 5Y*
- 38.93%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 43.59%
OLMA
- 1D
- -3.13%
- 1M
- -9.41%
- 6M
- -55.48%
- YTD
- -54.20%
- 1Y
- 114.82%
- 3Y*
- 8.04%
- 5Y*
- -13.38%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -21.36%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.29M | $12.39M | $17.04M | |
| $129.22M | $127.82M | $121.39M |
WFRD vs. OLMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFRD Weatherford International plc | 12.77% | 11.14% | -26.39% | 92.12% | 83.69% | 98.71% |
OLMA Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | -54.20% | 328.82% | -58.45% | 472.65% | -73.82% | -66.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between WFRD and OLMA is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2021 | 0.11 |
Fundamentals
WFRD:
$6.29B
OLMA:
$1.00B
WFRD:
$5.06
OLMA:
-$1.98
WFRD:
3.54
OLMA:
2.45
WFRD:
$4.78B
OLMA:
$0.00
WFRD:
$1.52B
OLMA:
-$187.00K
WFRD:
$481.00M
OLMA:
-$197.79M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WFRD vs. OLMA — Risk / Return Rank
WFRD
OLMA
WFRD vs. OLMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Weatherford International plc (WFRD) and Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (OLMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WFRD | OLMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.39 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 1.66 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.50 | 2.87 | +2.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WFRD vs. OLMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WFRD drawdown since its inception was -70.56%, smaller than the maximum OLMA drawdown of -96.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFRD and OLMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WFRD | OLMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.56% | -96.26% | +25.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.82% | -74.35% | +44.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.56% | -82.15% | +11.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.56% | -93.36% | +22.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.77% | -78.99% | +46.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.39% | -75.06% | +52.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.45% | 42.93% | -32.48% |
Volatility
WFRD vs. OLMA - Volatility Comparison
Weatherford International plc (WFRD) and Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (OLMA) have volatilities of 13.03% and 13.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WFRD | OLMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.03% | 13.68% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.50% | 51.96% | -22.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.79% | 160.11% | -119.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.96% | 107.79% | -56.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.82% | 105.35% | -53.53% |
Dividends
WFRD vs. OLMA - Dividend Comparison
WFRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, while OLMA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
OLMA Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WFRD Weatherford International plc | 1.20% | 1.28% | 0.70% |
Financials
WFRD vs. OLMA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Weatherford International plc and Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
WFRD and OLMA have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OLMA has higher volatility (13.68%) compared to WFRD (13.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFRD dropped -70.56% vs OLMA's -96.26%.
WFRD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WFRD and OLMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer