WFRD vs. OLMA

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

WFRD (Weatherford International plc) and OLMA (Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) are both stocks. WFRD operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while OLMA operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, WFRD returned 38.20%/yr vs -17.80%/yr for OLMA. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

WFRD vs. OLMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Weatherford International plc (WFRD) and Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (OLMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WFRD achieves a 17.89% return, which is significantly higher than OLMA's -60.00% return.

WFRD

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: -15.64%
• YTD: 17.89%
• 6M: 14.66%
• 1Y: 82.18%
• 3Y*: 14.64%
• 5Y*: 38.20%
• 10Y*: —

OLMA

• 1D: 5.15%
• 1M: -26.90%
• YTD: -60.00%
• 6M: -64.51%
• 1Y: 142.13%
• 3Y*: 8.31%
• 5Y*: -17.80%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WFRD vs. OLMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WFRD Weatherford International plc	17.89%	11.14%	-26.39%	92.12%	83.69%	98.71%
OLMA Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	-60.00%	328.82%	-58.45%	472.65%	-73.82%	-66.14%

Correlation

The correlation between WFRD and OLMA is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2021	0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap WFRD : $6.63B OLMA : $1.03B
EPS WFRD : $6.40 OLMA : -$2.03
PB Ratio WFRD : 3.77 OLMA : 2.14
Total Revenue (TTM) WFRD : $4.88B OLMA : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) WFRD : $1.90B OLMA : -$187.00K
EBITDA (TTM) WFRD : $800.00M OLMA : -$197.79M

Return for Risk

WFRD vs. OLMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFRD

WFRD Risk / Return Rank: 87
WFRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
WFRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
WFRD Omega Ratio Rank: 83
WFRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
WFRD Martin Ratio Rank: 91

OLMA

OLMA Risk / Return Rank: 79
OLMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
OLMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
OLMA Omega Ratio Rank: 90
OLMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
OLMA Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFRD vs. OLMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Weatherford International plc (WFRD) and Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (OLMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WFRD	OLMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	0.89	+1.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	3.24	-0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.41	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.06	1.92	+2.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.79	3.89	+8.90

WFRD vs. OLMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WFRD Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the OLMA Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFRD and OLMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WFRD vs. OLMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFRD drawdown since its inception was -70.56%, smaller than the maximum OLMA drawdown of -96.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFRD and OLMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	WFRD	OLMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.56%	-96.26%	+25.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.34%	-74.35%	+54.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-70.56%	-82.15%	+11.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-70.56%	-93.36%	+22.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.72%	-81.65%	+51.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.09%	-74.99%	+52.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.49%	36.69%	-30.20%

Volatility

WFRD vs. OLMA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Weatherford International plc (WFRD) is 11.51%, while Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (OLMA) has a volatility of 22.54%. This indicates that WFRD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OLMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WFRD	OLMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.51%	22.54%	-11.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.62%	53.62%	-24.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.97%	160.85%	-118.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.09%	107.89%	-56.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.96%	106.13%	-54.17%

Dividends

WFRD vs. OLMA - Dividend Comparison

WFRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, while OLMA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
OLMA Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WFRD Weatherford International plc	1.14%	1.28%	0.70%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WFRD and OLMA in my portfolio?

WFRD and OLMA have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WFRD or OLMA?

OLMA has higher volatility (22.54%) compared to WFRD (11.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFRD dropped -70.56% vs OLMA's -96.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WFRD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.