PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
WFC vs. VGT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between WFC and VGT is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

WFC vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
32.22%
8.78%
WFC
VGT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

WFC:

2.46

VGT:

1.39

Sortino Ratio

WFC:

3.44

VGT:

1.88

Omega Ratio

WFC:

1.46

VGT:

1.25

Calmar Ratio

WFC:

4.33

VGT:

1.98

Martin Ratio

WFC:

11.43

VGT:

7.00

Ulcer Index

WFC:

6.31%

VGT:

4.31%

Daily Std Dev

WFC:

29.17%

VGT:

21.60%

Max Drawdown

WFC:

-79.01%

VGT:

-54.63%

Current Drawdown

WFC:

0.00%

VGT:

-2.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WFC achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's 1.74% return. Over the past 10 years, WFC has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 6.92%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 21.01% annualized return.


WFC

YTD

10.83%

1M

10.68%

6M

32.22%

1Y

64.66%

5Y*

13.08%

10Y*

6.92%

VGT

YTD

1.74%

1M

0.16%

6M

8.78%

1Y

26.59%

5Y*

20.37%

10Y*

21.01%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

WFC vs. VGT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WFC is 9494
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WFC is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WFC is 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WFC is 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WFC is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WFC is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VGT is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VGT is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VGT is 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VGT is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VGT is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VGT is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WFC vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for WFC, currently valued at 2.46, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.461.39
The chart of Sortino ratio for WFC, currently valued at 3.44, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.441.88
The chart of Omega ratio for WFC, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.461.25
The chart of Calmar ratio for WFC, currently valued at 4.33, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.331.98
The chart of Martin ratio for WFC, currently valued at 11.43, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0011.437.00
WFC
VGT

The current WFC Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFC and VGT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.46
1.39
WFC
VGT

Dividends

WFC vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

WFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than VGT's 0.59% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
1.93%2.14%2.64%2.66%1.25%4.04%3.57%3.56%2.54%2.75%2.71%2.46%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.59%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%1.12%

Drawdowns

WFC vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFC drawdown since its inception was -79.01%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFC and VGT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember20250
-2.25%
WFC
VGT

Volatility

WFC vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has a higher volatility of 8.50% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 6.90%. This indicates that WFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
8.50%
6.90%
WFC
VGT
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab