WFC vs. AAPL
Compare and contrast key facts about Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) and Apple Inc (AAPL).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WFC or AAPL.
Correlation
The correlation between WFC and AAPL is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
WFC vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
WFC:
1.61
AAPL:
1.38
WFC:
2.43
AAPL:
2.04
WFC:
1.32
AAPL:
1.26
WFC:
2.67
AAPL:
1.88
WFC:
7.65
AAPL:
4.89
WFC:
6.06%
AAPL:
6.39%
WFC:
28.71%
AAPL:
22.57%
WFC:
-79.01%
AAPL:
-81.80%
WFC:
-9.06%
AAPL:
0.00%
Fundamentals
WFC:
$235.76B
AAPL:
$3.83T
WFC:
$4.81
AAPL:
$6.08
WFC:
14.72
AAPL:
41.69
WFC:
3.30
AAPL:
2.62
WFC:
$81.33B
AAPL:
$391.04B
WFC:
$82.81B
AAPL:
$180.68B
WFC:
$50.48B
AAPL:
$134.66B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WFC achieves a 46.69% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's 32.83% return. Over the past 10 years, WFC has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 5.43%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 26.14% annualized return.
WFC
46.69%
-6.00%
22.69%
46.81%
8.37%
5.43%
AAPL
32.83%
11.13%
22.93%
31.36%
30.37%
26.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WFC vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WFC vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
WFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than AAPL's 0.39% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFC Wells Fargo & Company | 2.13% | 2.64% | 2.66% | 1.25% | 4.04% | 3.57% | 3.56% | 2.54% | 2.75% | 2.71% | 2.46% | 2.53% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.39% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% | 1.67% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
WFC vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WFC drawdown since its inception was -79.01%, roughly equal to the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFC and AAPL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WFC vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 4.04%. This indicates that WFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
WFC vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wells Fargo & Company and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities