WFC vs. AAPL
Compare and contrast key facts about Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) and Apple Inc. (AAPL).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WFC or AAPL.
Key characteristics
WFC | AAPL | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 22.64% | -4.63% |
1Y Return | 67.14% | 11.20% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 12.08% | 13.45% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 7.32% | 29.21% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 5.02% | 25.69% |
Sharpe Ratio | 2.53 | 0.49 |
Daily Std Dev | 23.75% | 20.67% |
Max Drawdown | -79.02% | -81.80% |
Current Drawdown | -1.90% | -7.32% |
Fundamentals
WFC | AAPL | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | $208.97B | $2.81T |
EPS | $4.80 | $6.44 |
PE Ratio | 12.49 | 28.48 |
PEG Ratio | 23.68 | 2.15 |
Revenue (TTM) | $77.60B | $385.71B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | $72.25B | $170.78B |
Correlation
The correlation between WFC and AAPL is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
WFC vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, WFC achieves a 22.64% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's -4.63% return. Over the past 10 years, WFC has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 5.02%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 25.69% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WFC vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) and Apple Inc. (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WFC vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
WFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than AAPL's 0.52% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wells Fargo & Company | 1.75% | 2.64% | 2.66% | 1.25% | 4.04% | 3.57% | 3.56% | 2.54% | 2.75% | 2.71% | 2.46% | 2.53% |
Apple Inc. | 0.52% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% | 1.67% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
WFC vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WFC drawdown since its inception was -79.02%, roughly equal to the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFC and AAPL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WFC vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is 5.09%, while Apple Inc. (AAPL) has a volatility of 9.16%. This indicates that WFC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
WFC vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wells Fargo & Company and Apple Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities