WFC vs. AAPL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) and Apple Inc (AAPL).

Performance

WFC vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WFC vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WFC Wells Fargo & Company	-14.16%	35.57%	46.48%	22.94%	-11.92%	61.15%	-41.65%	21.44%	-21.83%	13.21%
AAPL Apple Inc	-6.56%	9.05%	30.71%	49.01%	-26.40%	34.65%	82.31%	88.96%	-5.39%	48.46%

Fundamentals

Market Cap WFC : $256.14B AAPL : $3.76T
EPS WFC : $6.60 AAPL : $7.89
PE Ratio WFC : 12.07 AAPL : 32.15
PEG Ratio WFC : 1.04 AAPL : 4.23
PS Ratio WFC : 2.27 AAPL : 8.69
PB Ratio WFC : 1.56 AAPL : 42.62
Total Revenue (TTM) WFC : $113.26B AAPL : $435.62B
Gross Profit (TTM) WFC : $81.08B AAPL : $206.16B
EBITDA (TTM) WFC : $29.35B AAPL : $150.07B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WFC achieves a -14.16% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's -6.56% return. Over the past 10 years, WFC has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 8.07%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 26.13% annualized return.

WFC

• 1D: 3.66%
• 1M: -2.26%
• YTD: -14.16%
• 6M: -4.05%
• 1Y: 13.30%
• 3Y*: 32.00%
• 5Y*: 17.69%
• 10Y*: 8.07%

AAPL

• 1D: 2.90%
• 1M: -3.93%
• YTD: -6.56%
• 6M: -0.14%
• 1Y: 14.75%
• 3Y*: 16.01%
• 5Y*: 16.20%
• 10Y*: 26.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

WFC vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFC

WFC Risk / Return Rank: 56
WFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
WFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
WFC Omega Ratio Rank: 51
WFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
WFC Martin Ratio Rank: 62

AAPL

AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 59
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 56
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFC vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WFC	AAPL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	0.47	-0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.78	0.92	-0.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.13	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.66	0.74	-0.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.07	2.30	-0.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WFC vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WFC Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is comparable to the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFC and AAPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WFC	AAPL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45	0.47	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.59	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25	0.91	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.43	-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between WFC and AAPL is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

WFC vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

WFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than AAPL's 0.41% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WFC Wells Fargo & Company	2.20%	1.82%	2.14%	2.64%	2.66%	1.25%	4.04%	3.57%	3.56%	2.54%	2.75%	2.71%
AAPL Apple Inc	0.41%	0.38%	0.40%	0.49%	0.70%	0.49%	0.61%	1.04%	1.79%	1.45%	1.93%	1.93%

Drawdowns

WFC vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFC drawdown since its inception was -79.01%, roughly equal to the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFC and AAPL.

Drawdown Indicators

	WFC	AAPL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.01%	-81.80%	+2.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.75%	-22.99%	+0.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.10%	-33.36%	-3.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.46%	-38.52%	-25.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.00%	-11.24%	-5.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.34%	-29.71%	+14.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.28%	7.38%	-0.10%

Volatility

WFC vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has a higher volatility of 7.89% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 5.58%. This indicates that WFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WFC	AAPL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.89%	5.58%	+2.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.89%	15.09%	+4.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.40%	31.66%	-2.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.17%	27.46%	+2.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.16%	28.94%	+3.22%

Financials

WFC vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Wells Fargo & Company and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

WFC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported a gross profit of 21.29B and revenue of 21.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 69.23B and revenue of 143.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.2%.

WFC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported an operating income of 6.53B and revenue of 21.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.7%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 50.85B and revenue of 143.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.4%.

WFC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported a net income of 5.36B and revenue of 21.29B, resulting in a net margin of 25.2%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 42.10B and revenue of 143.76B, resulting in a net margin of 29.3%.