WFC vs. AAPL

In the year-to-date period, WFC achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's -16.34% return. Over the past 10 years, WFC has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 5.30%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 22.03% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current WFC Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFC and AAPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

WFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, more than AAPL's 0.48% yield.

The maximum WFC drawdown since its inception was -79.01%, roughly equal to the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFC and AAPL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is 16.63%, while Apple Inc (AAPL) has a volatility of 22.62%. This indicates that WFC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wells Fargo & Company and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.