WFC vs. AAPL
Compare and contrast key facts about Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) and Apple Inc (AAPL).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WFC or AAPL.
Correlation
The correlation between WFC and AAPL is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
WFC vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
WFC:
2.07
AAPL:
1.42
WFC:
2.96
AAPL:
2.03
WFC:
1.40
AAPL:
1.26
WFC:
3.49
AAPL:
2.04
WFC:
9.31
AAPL:
6.10
WFC:
6.25%
AAPL:
5.54%
WFC:
28.16%
AAPL:
23.86%
WFC:
-79.01%
AAPL:
-81.80%
WFC:
-0.83%
AAPL:
-5.36%
Fundamentals
WFC:
$264.27B
AAPL:
$3.68T
WFC:
$5.37
AAPL:
$6.31
WFC:
14.96
AAPL:
38.81
WFC:
3.55
AAPL:
2.26
WFC:
$80.14B
AAPL:
$395.76B
WFC:
$81.61B
AAPL:
$184.10B
WFC:
$49.21B
AAPL:
$134.27B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WFC achieves a 14.96% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's -2.11% return. Over the past 10 years, WFC has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 6.93%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 23.88% annualized return.
WFC
14.96%
4.76%
46.43%
58.98%
13.92%
6.93%
AAPL
-2.11%
6.59%
8.40%
35.51%
26.49%
23.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WFC vs. AAPL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
WFC
AAPL
WFC vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WFC vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
WFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than AAPL's 0.41% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFC Wells Fargo & Company | 1.93% | 2.14% | 2.64% | 2.66% | 1.25% | 4.04% | 3.57% | 3.56% | 2.54% | 2.75% | 2.71% | 2.46% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.41% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% | 1.67% |
Drawdowns
WFC vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WFC drawdown since its inception was -79.01%, roughly equal to the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFC and AAPL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WFC vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is 4.20%, while Apple Inc (AAPL) has a volatility of 8.48%. This indicates that WFC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
WFC vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wells Fargo & Company and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities