WEAT.L vs. WEAT
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Wheat (WEAT.L) and Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT).
WEAT.L and WEAT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WEAT.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Wheat. It was launched on Sep 22, 2006. WEAT is a passively managed fund by Teucrium that tracks the performance of the Teucrium Wheat Fund Benchmark. It was launched on Sep 19, 2011. Both WEAT.L and WEAT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WEAT.L or WEAT.
Key characteristics
| WEAT.L | WEAT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 5.39% | 3.69% |
| 1Y Return | -4.09% | -4.62% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -8.73% | -3.23% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 1.05% | 3.44% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -8.53% | -9.05% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.00 | -0.23 |
| Daily Std Dev | 33.67% | 28.89% |
| Max Drawdown | -93.13% | -80.83% |
| Current Drawdown | -91.40% | -75.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between WEAT.L and WEAT is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
WEAT.L vs. WEAT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, WEAT.L achieves a 5.39% return, which is significantly higher than WEAT's 3.69% return. Over the past 10 years, WEAT.L has outperformed WEAT with an annualized return of -8.53%, while WEAT has yielded a comparatively lower -9.05% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WEAT.L vs. WEAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
WEAT.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than WEAT's 1.91% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WEAT.L vs. WEAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Wheat (WEAT.L) and Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WEAT.L vs. WEAT - Dividend Comparison
Neither WEAT.L nor WEAT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
WEAT.L vs. WEAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WEAT.L drawdown since its inception was -93.13%, which is greater than WEAT's maximum drawdown of -80.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEAT.L and WEAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WEAT.L vs. WEAT - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Wheat (WEAT.L) has a higher volatility of 10.82% compared to Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) at 8.34%. This indicates that WEAT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WEAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.