WEAT.L vs. HOGS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Wheat (WEAT.L) and WisdomTree Lean Hogs (HOGS.L).
WEAT.L and HOGS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WEAT.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Wheat. It was launched on Sep 22, 2006. HOGS.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Lean Hogs. It was launched on Sep 22, 2006. Both WEAT.L and HOGS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WEAT.L or HOGS.L.
Key characteristics
| WEAT.L | HOGS.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -21.04% | 28.94% |
| 1Y Return | -15.05% | 17.31% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -20.14% | 3.66% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -5.69% | -1.47% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -8.75% | -8.48% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.50 | 0.74 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.56 | 1.19 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.94 | 1.14 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.15 | 0.20 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.84 | 2.13 |
| Ulcer Index | 16.48% | 8.50% |
| Daily Std Dev | 28.03% | 24.45% |
| Max Drawdown | -93.61% | -93.96% |
| Current Drawdown | -93.56% | -87.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between WEAT.L and HOGS.L is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
WEAT.L vs. HOGS.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, WEAT.L achieves a -21.04% return, which is significantly lower than HOGS.L's 28.94% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WEAT.L having a -8.75% annualized return and HOGS.L not far ahead at -8.48%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WEAT.L vs. HOGS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both WEAT.L and HOGS.L have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WEAT.L vs. HOGS.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Wheat (WEAT.L) and WisdomTree Lean Hogs (HOGS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WEAT.L vs. HOGS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WEAT.L nor HOGS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
WEAT.L vs. HOGS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WEAT.L drawdown since its inception was -93.61%, roughly equal to the maximum HOGS.L drawdown of -93.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEAT.L and HOGS.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WEAT.L vs. HOGS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Wheat (WEAT.L) is 5.77%, while WisdomTree Lean Hogs (HOGS.L) has a volatility of 6.90%. This indicates that WEAT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOGS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.