PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
WDNA vs. IYH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

WDNA vs. IYH

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WDNA (WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund) and IYH (iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - WDNA tracks the WisdomTree BioRevolution Index while IYH tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WDNA returned -4.78%/yr vs 5.19%/yr for IYH. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WDNA charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for IYH.

Performance

WDNA vs. IYH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA) and iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDNA achieves a 8.96% return, which is significantly higher than IYH's -1.42% return.

WDNA

1D
2.94%
1M
2.56%
YTD
8.96%
6M
10.44%
1Y
50.50%
3Y*
3.54%
5Y*
-4.78%
10Y*
—

IYH

1D
2.89%
1M
4.56%
YTD
-1.42%
6M
-1.04%
1Y
16.06%
3Y*
6.36%
5Y*
5.19%
10Y*
9.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDNA vs. IYH - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
WDNA
WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund		8.96%22.68%-14.18%-2.07%-26.29%-5.27%
IYH
iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF		-1.42%13.16%2.99%2.14%-4.46%15.36%

Correlation

The correlation between WDNA and IYH is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2021

0.65

The correlation between WDNA and IYH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

WDNA vs. IYH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
WDNA
IYH

Healthcare

85.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

6.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.0%

-

Energy

1.1%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

WDNA
85.0%
IYH
100.0%

Basic Materials

WDNA
6.5%
IYH

-

Consumer Defensive

WDNA
3.0%
IYH

-

Energy

WDNA
1.1%
IYH

-

Communication Services

WDNA

-

IYH

-

Consumer Cyclical

WDNA

-

IYH

-

Financial Services

WDNA

-

IYH

-

Industrials

WDNA

-

IYH

-

Real Estate

WDNA

-

IYH

-

Technology

WDNA

-

IYH

-

Utilities

WDNA

-

IYH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund

iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF

Often compared with WDNA:
WDNA vs. AGNGWDNA vs. BBPWDNA vs. HELXWDNA vs. IDNAWDNA vs. IBBQWDNA vs. XBIWDNA vs. SCHG
Often compared with IYH:
IYH vs. VHTIYH vs. XLVIYH vs. SPYIYH vs. IYEIYH vs. IFRAIYH vs. BMEDIYH vs. IBB

Return for Risk

WDNA vs. IYH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
WDNA
WDNA Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
WDNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDNA Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
WDNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDNA Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
IYH
IYH Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
IYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYH Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
IYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYH Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDNA vs. IYH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA) and iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

WDNAIYHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.98
1.07

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.85
1.71

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.19

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.34

1.52

+2.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.85

3.64

+6.21

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WDNA vs. IYH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDNA Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the IYH Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDNA and IYH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

WDNAIYHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

1.07

+0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

0.35

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.55

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.19

0.43

-0.62

Drawdowns

WDNA vs. IYH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDNA drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, which is greater than IYH's maximum drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDNA and IYH.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

WDNAIYHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.87%

-43.12%

-15.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.70%

-10.64%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.25%

-17.91%

-20.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.87%

-17.91%

-40.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-28.40%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.86%

-4.68%

-25.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.64%

-8.96%

-26.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.14%

4.42%

+0.72%

Volatility

WDNA vs. IYH - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA) has a higher volatility of 7.35% compared to iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) at 5.06%. This indicates that WDNA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

WDNAIYHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.35%

5.06%

+2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.59%

10.70%

+5.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.66%

15.01%

+10.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.08%

14.97%

+10.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.07%

16.74%

+8.33%

WDNA vs. IYH - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDNA has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IYH's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

WDNA vs. IYH - Dividend Comparison

WDNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than IYH's 1.26% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYH
iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF		1.26%1.19%1.25%1.18%1.10%0.94%1.16%1.14%1.95%1.10%1.29%2.02%
WDNA
WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund		4.19%4.57%0.75%0.80%0.38%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

WDNA and IYH have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WDNA has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to IYH (5.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDNA dropped -58.87% vs IYH's -43.12%.

On 5-year performance, IYH leads with 5.19% vs -4.78% for WDNA. On fees, IYH is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, IYH has been the lower-risk option at 5.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IYH has performed better with a 5.19% return vs -4.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYH is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WDNA.

WDNA has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 1.26% for IYH.

WDNA tracks WisdomTree BioRevolution Index, while IYH tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDNA and 0.43% for IYH.

WDNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDNA and IYH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer