PortfoliosLab logo
WD vs. ELF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between WD and ELF is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

WD vs. ELF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (WD) and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

WD:

-0.69

ELF:

-0.54

Sortino Ratio

WD:

-1.02

ELF:

-0.53

Omega Ratio

WD:

0.88

ELF:

0.93

Calmar Ratio

WD:

-0.48

ELF:

-0.54

Martin Ratio

WD:

-1.36

ELF:

-0.84

Ulcer Index

WD:

18.62%

ELF:

49.52%

Daily Std Dev

WD:

33.00%

ELF:

72.38%

Max Drawdown

WD:

-68.49%

ELF:

-77.09%

Current Drawdown

WD:

-50.92%

ELF:

-48.70%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WD:

$2.34B

ELF:

$5.17B

EPS

WD:

$2.88

ELF:

$1.65

PE Ratio

WD:

23.61

ELF:

54.85

PEG Ratio

WD:

1.25

ELF:

2.03

PS Ratio

WD:

2.22

ELF:

3.97

PB Ratio

WD:

1.33

ELF:

6.65

Total Revenue (TTM)

WD:

$1.14B

ELF:

$980.87M

Gross Profit (TTM)

WD:

$700.10M

ELF:

$698.65M

EBITDA (TTM)

WD:

$373.92M

ELF:

$137.51M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WD achieves a -27.80% return, which is significantly lower than ELF's -10.92% return.


WD

YTD

-27.80%

1M

-10.15%

6M

-36.67%

1Y

-22.69%

3Y*

-11.77%

5Y*

14.10%

10Y*

12.98%

ELF

YTD

-10.92%

1M

79.89%

6M

-12.04%

1Y

-39.14%

3Y*

62.67%

5Y*

45.52%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Walker & Dunlop, Inc.

e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

WD vs. ELF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WD is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WD is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WD is 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WD is 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WD is 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WD is 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

ELF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ELF is 2222
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ELF is 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ELF is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ELF is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ELF is 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ELF is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WD vs. ELF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (WD) and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current WD Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is comparable to the ELF Sharpe Ratio of -0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WD and ELF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

WD vs. ELF - Dividend Comparison

WD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, while ELF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
WD
Walker & Dunlop, Inc.
3.83%2.67%2.27%3.06%1.33%1.56%1.86%2.31%
ELF
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

WD vs. ELF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WD drawdown since its inception was -68.49%, smaller than the maximum ELF drawdown of -77.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WD and ELF.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

WD vs. ELF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (WD) is 11.73%, while e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) has a volatility of 25.78%. This indicates that WD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ELF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

WD vs. ELF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Walker & Dunlop, Inc. and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20212022202320242025
237.37M
355.32M
(WD) Total Revenue
(ELF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WD vs. ELF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Walker & Dunlop, Inc. and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20212022202320242025
93.5%
71.3%
(WD) Gross Margin
(ELF) Gross Margin
WD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Walker & Dunlop, Inc. reported a gross profit of 221.85M and revenue of 237.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 93.5%.

ELF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported a gross profit of 253.31M and revenue of 355.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.3%.

WD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Walker & Dunlop, Inc. reported an operating income of -10.27M and revenue of 237.37M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.3%.

ELF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported an operating income of 35.09M and revenue of 355.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

WD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Walker & Dunlop, Inc. reported a net income of 2.75M and revenue of 237.37M, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.

ELF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported a net income of 35.30M and revenue of 355.32M, resulting in a net margin of 9.9%.