WCN vs. NDAQ
WCN (Waste Connections, Inc.) and NDAQ (Nasdaq, Inc.) are both stocks. WCN operates in Waste Management (Industrials), while NDAQ operates in Financial Data & Stock Exchanges (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, WCN returned 13.90%/yr vs 16.62%/yr for NDAQ. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
WCN vs. NDAQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WCN achieves a -4.14% return, which is significantly lower than NDAQ's -2.37% return. Over the past 10 years, WCN has underperformed NDAQ with an annualized return of 13.90%, while NDAQ has yielded a comparatively higher 16.62% annualized return.
WCN
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- -4.14%
- 1Y
- -9.56%
- 3Y*
- 6.20%
- 5Y*
- 6.50%
- 10Y*
- 13.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.09%
NDAQ
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 11.26%
- 6M
- -2.13%
- YTD
- -2.37%
- 1Y
- 0.22%
- 3Y*
- 25.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.13%
- 10Y*
- 16.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
NDAQ Nasdaq, Inc. | $352.66M | $369.72M | $355.11M |
| $252.66M | $226.08M | $266.58M |
WCN vs. NDAQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WCN Waste Connections, Inc. | -4.14% | 2.92% | 15.72% | 13.47% | -2.02% | 33.80% | 13.86% | 23.19% | 5.47% | 36.38% |
NDAQ Nasdaq, Inc. | -2.37% | 27.19% | 34.85% | -3.66% | -11.19% | 60.13% | 25.99% | 33.88% | 8.21% | 16.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between WCN and NDAQ is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2002 | 0.34 |
The correlation between WCN and NDAQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.41 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WCN:
$42.19B
NDAQ:
$52.65B
WCN:
$7.11
NDAQ:
$3.43
WCN:
23.56
NDAQ:
27.46
WCN:
1.12
NDAQ:
2.64
WCN:
3.29
NDAQ:
6.21
WCN:
$9.80B
NDAQ:
$8.71B
WCN:
$1.75B
NDAQ:
$5.17B
WCN:
$2.10B
NDAQ:
$3.19B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WCN vs. NDAQ — Risk / Return Rank
WCN
NDAQ
WCN vs. NDAQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Waste Connections, Inc. (WCN) and Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WCN | NDAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.02 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | -0.04 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.80 | -0.08 | -0.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WCN vs. NDAQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCN drawdown since its inception was -68.85%, roughly equal to the maximum NDAQ drawdown of -68.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCN and NDAQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WCN | NDAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.85% | -68.48% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.30% | -23.39% | +2.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.75% | -23.39% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.75% | -32.84% | +8.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.59% | -38.31% | +6.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.47% | -6.09% | -9.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.43% | -23.74% | +15.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.01% | 10.74% | +1.27% |
Volatility
WCN vs. NDAQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Waste Connections, Inc. (WCN) is 7.24%, while Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) has a volatility of 8.83%. This indicates that WCN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NDAQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WCN | NDAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.24% | 8.83% | -1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.30% | 24.30% | -5.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.67% | 27.37% | -4.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.71% | 24.64% | -4.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.89% | 24.59% | -4.70% |
Dividends
WCN vs. NDAQ - Dividend Comparison
WCN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than NDAQ's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDAQ Nasdaq, Inc. | 1.19% | 1.08% | 1.22% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.00% | 1.46% | 1.73% | 2.08% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.55% |
WCN Waste Connections, Inc. | 0.82% | 0.74% | 0.68% | 0.70% | 0.71% | 0.62% | 0.74% | 0.73% | 0.78% | 0.65% | 1.20% | 1.86% |
Financials
WCN vs. NDAQ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Waste Connections, Inc. and Nasdaq, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WCN vs. NDAQ - Profitability Comparison
WCN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Waste Connections, Inc. reported a gross profit of -1.01B and revenue of 2.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -39.4%.
NDAQ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nasdaq, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.50B and revenue of 2.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.2%.
WCN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Waste Connections, Inc. reported an operating income of 437.55M and revenue of 2.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.1%.
NDAQ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nasdaq, Inc. reported an operating income of 877.00M and revenue of 2.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.6%.
WCN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Waste Connections, Inc. reported a net income of 599.49M and revenue of 2.56B, resulting in a net margin of 23.4%.
NDAQ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nasdaq, Inc. reported a net income of 507.00M and revenue of 2.53B, resulting in a net margin of 20.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WCN and NDAQ have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NDAQ has higher volatility (8.83%) compared to WCN (7.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCN dropped -68.85% vs NDAQ's -68.48%.
NDAQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.03 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WCN and NDAQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer