PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WCN vs. NDAQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WCN vs. NDAQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Waste Connections, Inc. (WCN) and Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCN achieves a -14.61% return, which is significantly lower than NDAQ's -9.21% return. Over the past 10 years, WCN has underperformed NDAQ with an annualized return of 13.12%, while NDAQ has yielded a comparatively higher 16.88% annualized return.


WCN

1D
-0.28%
1M
-7.32%
YTD
-14.61%
6M
-13.59%
1Y
-23.44%
3Y*
3.00%
5Y*
5.08%
10Y*
13.12%

NDAQ

1D
-5.28%
1M
-3.73%
YTD
-9.21%
6M
-0.06%
1Y
5.93%
3Y*
17.63%
5Y*
10.92%
10Y*
16.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCN vs. NDAQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WCN
Waste Connections, Inc.
-14.61%2.92%15.72%13.47%-2.02%33.80%13.86%23.19%5.47%36.47%
NDAQ
Nasdaq, Inc.
-9.21%27.19%34.85%-3.66%-11.19%60.13%25.99%33.88%8.21%16.76%

Correlation

The correlation between WCN and NDAQ is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2002

0.34

The correlation between WCN and NDAQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.41 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

WCN:

$5.48

NDAQ:

$3.32

PE Ratio

WCN:

27.22

NDAQ:

26.49

PEG Ratio

WCN:

1.29

NDAQ:

2.55

PS Ratio

WCN:

2.99

NDAQ:

6.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

WCN:

$9.65B

NDAQ:

$8.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WCN:

$2.77B

NDAQ:

$4.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

WCN:

$2.68B

NDAQ:

$3.11B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WCN vs. NDAQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCN
WCN Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
WCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCN Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
WCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCN Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

NDAQ
NDAQ Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
NDAQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDAQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDAQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
NDAQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDAQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCN vs. NDAQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Waste Connections, Inc. (WCN) and Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WCNNDAQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.10

0.24

-1.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.53

0.47

-2.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.07

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-1.01

0.30

-1.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.84

0.71

-2.54

WCN vs. NDAQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCN Sharpe Ratio is -1.10, which is lower than the NDAQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCN and NDAQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WCNNDAQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.10

0.24

-1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.46

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.70

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.37

+0.17

Drawdowns

WCN vs. NDAQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCN drawdown since its inception was -68.85%, roughly equal to the maximum NDAQ drawdown of -68.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCN and NDAQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WCNNDAQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.85%

-68.48%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.28%

-21.76%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.75%

-21.76%

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.75%

-32.84%

+8.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.59%

-38.31%

+6.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.71%

-12.67%

-12.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.39%

-23.82%

+15.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.93%

9.20%

+3.73%

Volatility

WCN vs. NDAQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Waste Connections, Inc. (WCN) is 4.90%, while Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) has a volatility of 7.25%. This indicates that WCN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NDAQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WCNNDAQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

7.25%

-2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.71%

20.67%

-2.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.37%

24.40%

-3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.26%

23.94%

-4.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.71%

24.25%

-4.54%

Dividends

WCN vs. NDAQ - Dividend Comparison

WCN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than NDAQ's 1.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NDAQ
Nasdaq, Inc.
1.23%1.08%1.22%1.48%1.27%1.00%1.46%1.73%2.08%1.90%1.80%1.55%
WCN
Waste Connections, Inc.
0.92%0.74%0.68%0.70%0.71%0.62%0.74%0.73%0.78%0.70%1.20%1.86%

Financials

WCN vs. NDAQ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Waste Connections, Inc. and Nasdaq, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.40B1.60B1.80B2.00B2.20B2.40B20222023202420252026
2.37B
2.14B
(WCN) Total Revenue
(NDAQ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WCN vs. NDAQ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Waste Connections, Inc. and Nasdaq, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%202220232024202520260
65.8%
Portfolio components
WCN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Connections, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NDAQ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nasdaq, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.41B and revenue of 2.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.8%.

WCN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Connections, Inc. reported an operating income of 364.08M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.

NDAQ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nasdaq, Inc. reported an operating income of 657.00M and revenue of 2.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.7%.

WCN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Connections, Inc. reported a net income of 219.34M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in a net margin of 9.3%.

NDAQ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nasdaq, Inc. reported a net income of 519.00M and revenue of 2.14B, resulting in a net margin of 24.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WCN and NDAQ have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NDAQ has higher volatility (7.25%) compared to WCN (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCN dropped -68.85% vs NDAQ's -68.48%.

NDAQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WCN and NDAQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer