WCLD vs. SCHG
WCLD (WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WCLD is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BVP Nasdaq Emerging Cloud Index, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WCLD returned -12.33%/yr vs 13.27%/yr for SCHG. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WCLD charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
WCLD vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WCLD achieves a -16.34% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 1.35% return.
WCLD
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- -3.05%
- YTD
- -16.34%
- 6M
- -17.42%
- 1Y
- -16.84%
- 3Y*
- -1.60%
- 5Y*
- -12.33%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- -3.93%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 17.91%
- 3Y*
- 22.13%
- 5Y*
- 13.27%
- 10Y*
- 18.65%
WCLD vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WCLD WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund | -16.34% | -6.69% | 7.35% | 39.35% | -51.64% | -3.21% | 109.71% | 0.84% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 1.35% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 9.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between WCLD and SCHG is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2019 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WCLD and SCHG has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
WCLD vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WCLD
SCHG
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
WCLD
SCHG
Healthcare
WCLD
SCHG
Communication Services
WCLD
SCHG
Basic Materials
WCLD
-
SCHG
Consumer Cyclical
WCLD
-
SCHG
Consumer Defensive
WCLD
-
SCHG
Energy
WCLD
-
SCHG
Financial Services
WCLD
-
SCHG
Industrials
WCLD
-
SCHG
Real Estate
WCLD
-
SCHG
Utilities
WCLD
-
SCHG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WCLD vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
WCLD
SCHG
WCLD vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund (WCLD) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WCLD | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.20 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 1.10 | -1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.11 | 3.58 | -4.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WCLD vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCLD drawdown since its inception was -64.90%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCLD and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WCLD | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.90% | -34.59% | -30.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.68% | -16.41% | -18.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.06% | -23.39% | -18.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.90% | -34.59% | -30.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.17% | -6.46% | -48.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.66% | -5.20% | -30.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.20% | 5.02% | +10.18% |
Volatility
WCLD vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund (WCLD) has a higher volatility of 15.36% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.91%. This indicates that WCLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WCLD | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.36% | 5.91% | +9.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.45% | 12.52% | +17.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.22% | 16.24% | +18.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.46% | 22.38% | +15.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.40% | 21.58% | +15.82% |
WCLD vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
WCLD has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
WCLD vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
WCLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
WCLD WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WCLD and SCHG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WCLD has higher volatility (15.36%) compared to SCHG (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCLD dropped -64.90% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
On 5-year performance, SCHG leads with 13.27% vs -12.33% for WCLD. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 13.27% return vs -12.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WCLD.
SCHG has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for WCLD.
WCLD is categorized as Technology Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. WCLD tracks BVP Nasdaq Emerging Cloud Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WCLD and 0.04% for SCHG.
SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WCLD and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer