WCBR vs. XDAT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

WCBR (WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund) and XDAT (Franklin Exponential Data ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. WCBR is passively managed, while XDAT is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, WCBR returned 7.87%/yr vs -2.09%/yr for XDAT. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. WCBR charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for XDAT.

Performance

WCBR vs. XDAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCBR achieves a 33.66% return, which is significantly higher than XDAT's -4.07% return.

WCBR

• 1D: 1.78%
• 1M: -0.16%
• 6M: 41.80%
• YTD: 33.66%
• 1Y: 23.60%
• 3Y*: 21.29%
• 5Y*: 7.87%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.01%

XDAT

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: -0.63%
• 6M: 5.52%
• YTD: -4.07%
• 1Y: -5.52%
• 3Y*: 8.07%
• 5Y*: -2.09%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -0.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund	$1.51M	$1.66M	$1.37M
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF	$42.20K	$25.61K	$17.04K

WCBR vs. XDAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund	33.66%	-1.44%	11.42%	66.63%	-41.96%	7.65%
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF	-4.07%	1.87%	16.54%	45.77%	-45.71%	11.86%

Correlation

The correlation between WCBR and XDAT is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021	0.88

The correlation between WCBR and XDAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

WCBR vs. XDAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WCBR	XDAT
Technology	100.0%	65.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	28.9%
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	2.3%
Healthcare	-	2.6%
Industrials	-	0.3%
Real Estate	-	2.9%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

WCBR vs. XDAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WCBR

WCBR Risk / Return Rank: 25
WCBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
WCBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
WCBR Omega Ratio Rank: 26
WCBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
WCBR Martin Ratio Rank: 22

XDAT

XDAT Risk / Return Rank: 7
XDAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
XDAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
XDAT Omega Ratio Rank: 7
XDAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
XDAT Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WCBR vs. XDAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WCBR	XDAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.59	-0.32	+0.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.02	-0.28	+1.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	0.97	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.68	-0.27	+0.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.53	-0.53	+2.06

WCBR vs. XDAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCBR Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is higher than the XDAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCBR and XDAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WCBR vs. XDAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCBR drawdown since its inception was -52.25%, roughly equal to the maximum XDAT drawdown of -54.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCBR and XDAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	WCBR	XDAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.25%	-54.87%	+2.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.92%	-29.56%	-0.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.27%	-29.56%	-0.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.25%	-54.87%	+2.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.96%	-19.74%	+11.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.98%	-25.73%	+5.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.28%	14.89%	-1.61%

Volatility

WCBR vs. XDAT - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) has a higher volatility of 10.85% compared to Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) at 6.65%. This indicates that WCBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WCBR	XDAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.85%	6.65%	+4.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.41%	20.71%	+8.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.45%	25.07%	+9.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.06%	29.64%	+4.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.65%	29.34%	+4.31%

WCBR vs. XDAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCBR has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than XDAT's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

WCBR vs. XDAT - Dividend Comparison

Neither WCBR nor XDAT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%	0.00%	0.03%	0.43%
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WCBR and XDAT in my portfolio?

WCBR and XDAT have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WCBR or XDAT?

WCBR has higher volatility (10.85%) compared to XDAT (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCBR dropped -52.25% vs XDAT's -54.87%.

Which ETF is better, WCBR or XDAT?

On 5-year performance, WCBR leads with 7.87% vs -2.09% for XDAT. On fees, WCBR is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, XDAT has been the lower-risk option at 6.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WCBR or XDAT?

Over the 5-year period, WCBR has performed better with a 7.87% return vs -2.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WCBR or XDAT?

WCBR is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XDAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WCBR or XDAT?

WCBR and XDAT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between WCBR and XDAT?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WCBR and 0.50% for XDAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WCBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.