WBA vs. VTV
Compare and contrast key facts about Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (WBA) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV).
VTV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Prime Market Value Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WBA or VTV.
Key characteristics
| WBA | VTV | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -63.69% | 21.21% |
| 1Y Return | -55.05% | 30.33% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -40.18% | 9.77% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -28.66% | 11.68% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -15.23% | 10.67% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -1.08 | 3.18 |
| Sortino Ratio | -1.65 | 4.47 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.79 | 1.59 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.60 | 6.42 |
| Martin Ratio | -1.24 | 20.69 |
| Ulcer Index | 42.58% | 1.58% |
| Daily Std Dev | 49.29% | 10.27% |
| Max Drawdown | -87.93% | -59.27% |
| Current Drawdown | -86.79% | -0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between WBA and VTV is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
WBA vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, WBA achieves a -63.69% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 21.21% return. Over the past 10 years, WBA has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of -15.23%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.67% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WBA vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (WBA) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WBA vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
WBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.31%, more than VTV's 2.23% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBA Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. | 8.31% | 7.35% | 5.13% | 3.63% | 4.64% | 3.05% | 2.46% | 2.13% | 1.78% | 1.64% | 1.71% | 2.05% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 2.23% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% | 2.22% | 2.21% |
Drawdowns
WBA vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WBA drawdown since its inception was -87.93%, which is greater than VTV's maximum drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBA and VTV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WBA vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (WBA) has a higher volatility of 14.29% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 3.65%. This indicates that WBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.