PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
WATT vs. CHK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between WATT and CHK is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

WATT vs. CHK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Energous Corporation (WATT) and Chesapeake Energy Corporation (CHK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-50.00%0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-50.98%
13.37%
WATT
CHK

Key characteristics

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WATT:

$8.44M

CHK:

$10.70B

EPS

WATT:

-$3.06

CHK:

$3.03

PEG Ratio

WATT:

0.00

CHK:

1.85

Total Revenue (TTM)

WATT:

$340.00K

CHK:

$1.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WATT:

-$245.00K

CHK:

$243.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

WATT:

-$12.88M

CHK:

$560.00M

Returns By Period


WATT

YTD

-57.92%

1M

-55.09%

6M

-50.70%

1Y

-74.63%

5Y*

-58.82%

10Y*

-45.94%

CHK

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

WATT vs. CHK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WATT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WATT is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WATT is 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WATT is 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WATT is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WATT is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WATT is 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

CHK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CHK is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CHK is 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CHK is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CHK is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CHK is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CHK is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WATT vs. CHK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energous Corporation (WATT) and Chesapeake Energy Corporation (CHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for WATT, currently valued at -0.13, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-0.130.56
The chart of Sortino ratio for WATT, currently valued at 3.49, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.490.99
The chart of Omega ratio for WATT, currently valued at 1.48, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.481.14
The chart of Calmar ratio for WATT, currently valued at -0.74, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.740.39
The chart of Martin ratio for WATT, currently valued at -1.18, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-1.180.94
WATT
CHK


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.13
0.56
WATT
CHK

Dividends

WATT vs. CHK - Dividend Comparison

Neither WATT nor CHK has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2024202320222021
WATT
Energous Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CHK
Chesapeake Energy Corporation
2.82%2.82%4.70%10.16%1.74%

Drawdowns

WATT vs. CHK - Drawdown Comparison


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-99.71%
-15.83%
WATT
CHK

Volatility

WATT vs. CHK - Volatility Comparison

Energous Corporation (WATT) has a higher volatility of 33.46% compared to Chesapeake Energy Corporation (CHK) at 0.00%. This indicates that WATT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
33.46%
0
WATT
CHK

Financials

WATT vs. CHK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energous Corporation and Chesapeake Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab