WASH vs. BAC
WASH (Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc.) and BAC (Bank of America Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — WASH in Banks - Regional, BAC in Banks - Diversified. Over the past 10 years, WASH returned 5.60%/yr vs 18.54%/yr for BAC. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
WASH vs. BAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WASH achieves a 38.88% return, which is significantly higher than BAC's 13.86% return. Over the past 10 years, WASH has underperformed BAC with an annualized return of 5.60%, while BAC has yielded a comparatively higher 18.54% annualized return.
WASH
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 9.62%
- 6M
- 17.14%
- YTD
- 38.88%
- 1Y
- 58.34%
- 3Y*
- 15.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.03%
- 10Y*
- 5.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.48%
BAC
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- 6M
- 17.71%
- YTD
- 13.86%
- 1Y
- 38.63%
- 3Y*
- 28.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.79%
- 10Y*
- 18.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.02B | $2.04B | $2.03B | |
| $7.40M | $6.21M | $6.23M |
WASH vs. BAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WASH Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. | 38.88% | 1.69% | 2.68% | -26.09% | -12.49% | 30.86% | -11.78% | 17.70% | -7.75% | -2.21% |
BAC Bank of America Corporation | 13.86% | 28.04% | 33.85% | 4.83% | -23.82% | 49.61% | -11.63% | 46.19% | -15.00% | 35.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between WASH and BAC is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995 | 0.41 |
The correlation between WASH and BAC shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.62 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WASH:
$743.18M
BAC:
$439.63B
WASH:
$2.74
BAC:
$4.50
WASH:
14.20
BAC:
13.75
WASH:
1.98
BAC:
2.61
WASH:
$378.02M
BAC:
$177.58B
WASH:
$209.71M
BAC:
$115.79B
WASH:
$70.90M
BAC:
$45.64B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WASH vs. BAC — Risk / Return Rank
WASH
BAC
WASH vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. (WASH) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WASH | BAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.27 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 1.90 | +1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.96 | 5.00 | +2.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WASH vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WASH drawdown since its inception was -60.33%, smaller than the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WASH and BAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WASH | BAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.33% | -93.10% | +32.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.65% | -17.93% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.25% | -27.51% | -4.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.33% | -46.64% | -13.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.33% | -48.95% | -11.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.62% | -1.07% | -11.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.45% | -28.21% | +10.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.98% | 6.82% | +0.16% |
Volatility
WASH vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison
Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. (WASH) has a higher volatility of 11.11% compared to Bank of America Corporation (BAC) at 5.89%. This indicates that WASH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WASH | BAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.11% | 5.89% | +5.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.39% | 16.31% | +11.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.25% | 21.85% | +13.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.09% | 26.67% | +7.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.01% | 30.46% | +3.55% |
Dividends
WASH vs. BAC - Dividend Comparison
WASH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, more than BAC's 1.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAC Bank of America Corporation | 1.81% | 1.96% | 2.28% | 2.73% | 2.60% | 1.75% | 2.38% | 1.87% | 2.19% | 1.32% | 1.13% | 1.19% |
WASH Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. | 5.75% | 7.58% | 5.36% | 6.92% | 4.62% | 3.73% | 4.58% | 3.72% | 3.70% | 2.89% | 2.60% | 3.44% |
Financials
WASH vs. BAC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. and Bank of America Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WASH vs. BAC - Profitability Comparison
WASH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. reported a gross profit of 53.60M and revenue of 92.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.2%.
BAC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported a gross profit of 30.19B and revenue of 49.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.1%.
WASH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.06M and revenue of 92.06M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.5%.
BAC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported an operating income of 11.57B and revenue of 49.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.4%.
WASH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. reported a net income of 12.60M and revenue of 92.06M, resulting in a net margin of 13.7%.
BAC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported a net income of 9.07B and revenue of 49.39B, resulting in a net margin of 18.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WASH and BAC have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WASH has higher volatility (11.11%) compared to BAC (5.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WASH dropped -60.33% vs BAC's -93.10%.
WASH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WASH and BAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer