PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WAMCX vs. FELAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WAMCX vs. FELAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A (FELAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WAMCX achieves a 7.13% return, which is significantly lower than FELAX's 84.79% return. Over the past 10 years, WAMCX has underperformed FELAX with an annualized return of 12.27%, while FELAX has yielded a comparatively higher 37.23% annualized return.


WAMCX

1D
0.06%
1M
5.08%
YTD
7.13%
6M
4.32%
1Y
17.44%
3Y*
7.28%
5Y*
-3.87%
10Y*
12.27%

FELAX

1D
6.40%
1M
26.18%
YTD
84.79%
6M
82.64%
1Y
169.50%
3Y*
63.50%
5Y*
43.56%
10Y*
37.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAMCX vs. FELAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WAMCX
Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund
7.13%-2.85%8.25%19.19%-39.71%5.23%71.48%38.09%10.34%31.60%
FELAX
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A
84.79%44.88%43.74%75.08%-35.07%57.50%43.57%63.76%-12.76%34.12%

Correlation

The correlation between WAMCX and FELAX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2000

0.76

The correlation between WAMCX and FELAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WAMCX vs. FELAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAMCX
WAMCX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
WAMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
WAMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

FELAX
FELAX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FELAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FELAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FELAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FELAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FELAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAMCX vs. FELAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A (FELAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WAMCXFELAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.72

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

12.18

-11.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.76

47.41

-43.65

WAMCX vs. FELAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WAMCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the FELAX Sharpe Ratio of 5.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WAMCX and FELAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WAMCXFELAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

5.49

-4.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

1.14

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

1.08

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.47

-0.09

Drawdowns

WAMCX vs. FELAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAMCX drawdown since its inception was -66.51%, smaller than the maximum FELAX drawdown of -71.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAMCX and FELAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WAMCXFELAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.51%

-71.33%

+4.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.89%

-14.66%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.21%

-36.43%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.18%

-46.15%

-7.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.18%

-46.15%

-7.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.01%

0.00%

-28.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.15%

-21.88%

+6.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.13%

3.76%

+1.37%

Volatility

WAMCX vs. FELAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX) is 4.94%, while Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A (FELAX) has a volatility of 11.89%. This indicates that WAMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FELAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WAMCXFELAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.94%

11.89%

-6.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.89%

25.31%

-9.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.33%

32.52%

-11.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.39%

38.34%

-10.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.62%

34.69%

-9.07%

WAMCX vs. FELAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAMCX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than FELAX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

WAMCX vs. FELAX - Dividend Comparison

WAMCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FELAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FELAX
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A
3.77%6.96%7.02%3.40%3.32%4.34%4.51%1.00%20.15%9.67%0.36%10.71%
WAMCX
Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%12.08%2.99%1.96%7.65%11.92%11.44%9.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


WAMCX and FELAX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FELAX has higher volatility (11.89%) compared to WAMCX (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAMCX dropped -66.51% vs FELAX's -71.33%.

FELAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.49 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WAMCX and FELAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer