WAINX vs. FBGRX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

WAINX (Wasatch Emerging India Fund) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - WAINX is a India Equities fund managed by Wasatch, while FBGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, WAINX returned 9.70%/yr vs 21.62%/yr for FBGRX. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WAINX charges 1.51%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.

Performance

WAINX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch Emerging India Fund (WAINX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WAINX achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 16.81% return. Over the past 10 years, WAINX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 9.70%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.62% annualized return.

WAINX

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 8.55%
• 6M: 3.46%
• YTD: 0.72%
• 1Y: -8.36%
• 3Y*: 4.95%
• 5Y*: 3.27%
• 10Y*: 9.70%

FBGRX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 1.69%
• 6M: 14.95%
• YTD: 16.81%
• 1Y: 33.14%
• 3Y*: 29.64%
• 5Y*: 14.72%
• 10Y*: 21.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAINX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WAINX Wasatch Emerging India Fund	0.72%	-5.33%	9.23%	20.90%	-21.77%	37.56%	17.63%	13.78%	-5.45%	53.39%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	16.81%	19.91%	39.77%	55.61%	-38.45%	22.64%	62.20%	33.43%	1.02%	36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between WAINX and FBGRX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2011	0.33

Return for Risk

WAINX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAINX

WAINX Risk / Return Rank: 1
WAINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
WAINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
WAINX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
WAINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
WAINX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

FBGRX

FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 61
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAINX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Emerging India Fund (WAINX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WAINX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.54	1.71	-2.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.71	2.32	-3.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.30	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.33	2.60	-2.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.69	10.33	-11.02

WAINX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WAINX Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is lower than the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WAINX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WAINX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAINX drawdown since its inception was -41.34%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAINX and FBGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WAINX	FBGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.34%	-58.64%	+17.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.63%	-12.65%	-14.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.01%	-27.07%	-3.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.01%	-43.08%	+12.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.34%	-43.08%	+1.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.93%	-2.21%	-10.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.35%	-12.50%	+3.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.54%	3.18%	+10.36%

Volatility

WAINX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wasatch Emerging India Fund (WAINX) is 4.77%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 7.94%. This indicates that WAINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WAINX	FBGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.77%	7.94%	-3.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.25%	15.28%	-1.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.93%	19.17%	-2.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.33%	25.15%	-7.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.05%	23.76%	-4.71%

WAINX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAINX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

WAINX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

WAINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.97%, more than FBGRX's 1.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	1.63%	1.90%	5.95%	0.93%	0.57%	8.73%	6.40%	3.70%	6.32%	4.23%	4.05%	5.30%
WAINX Wasatch Emerging India Fund	28.97%	29.17%	20.19%	4.23%	1.15%	4.29%	0.00%	0.32%	6.95%	2.91%	1.06%	1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WAINX and FBGRX in my portfolio?

WAINX and FBGRX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WAINX or FBGRX?

FBGRX has higher volatility (7.94%) compared to WAINX (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAINX dropped -41.34% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.