PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WAINX vs. FBGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WAINX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch Emerging India Fund (WAINX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WAINX achieves a -1.44% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 16.84% return. Over the past 10 years, WAINX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 10.33%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.38% annualized return.


WAINX

1D
1.23%
1M
9.63%
YTD
-1.44%
6M
-2.61%
1Y
-9.10%
3Y*
4.85%
5Y*
3.51%
10Y*
10.33%

FBGRX

1D
-1.86%
1M
2.83%
YTD
16.84%
6M
15.60%
1Y
40.72%
3Y*
30.85%
5Y*
15.32%
10Y*
22.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAINX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WAINX
Wasatch Emerging India Fund
-1.44%-5.33%9.23%20.90%-21.77%37.56%17.63%13.78%-5.45%53.39%
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
16.84%19.91%39.77%55.61%-38.45%22.64%62.20%33.43%1.02%36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between WAINX and FBGRX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2011

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WAINX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAINX
WAINX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
WAINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAINX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
WAINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAINX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

FBGRX
FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAINX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Emerging India Fund (WAINX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WAINXFBGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.38

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.28

3.31

-3.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.58

13.66

-14.23

WAINX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WAINX Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is lower than the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WAINX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WAINX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAINX drawdown since its inception was -41.34%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAINX and FBGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WAINXFBGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.34%

-58.64%

+17.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.83%

-12.65%

-16.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.01%

-27.07%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.01%

-43.08%

+12.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.34%

-43.08%

+1.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.80%

-2.19%

-12.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.34%

-12.51%

+3.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.20%

3.06%

+11.14%

Volatility

WAINX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wasatch Emerging India Fund (WAINX) is 4.33%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 8.03%. This indicates that WAINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WAINXFBGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

8.03%

-3.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.16%

14.72%

-0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.90%

18.85%

-1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.31%

25.09%

-7.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.05%

23.80%

-4.75%

WAINX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAINX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

WAINX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

WAINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.60%, more than FBGRX's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
1.63%1.90%5.95%0.93%0.57%8.73%6.40%3.70%6.32%4.23%4.05%5.30%
WAINX
Wasatch Emerging India Fund
29.60%29.17%20.19%4.23%1.15%4.29%0.00%0.32%6.95%2.91%1.06%1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


WAINX and FBGRX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBGRX has higher volatility (8.03%) compared to WAINX (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAINX dropped -41.34% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

FBGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WAINX and FBGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer