WAF.AX vs. AUZ.AX
Compare and contrast key facts about West African Resources Limited (WAF.AX) and Australian Mines Limited (AUZ.AX).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WAF.AX or AUZ.AX.
Key characteristics
WAF.AX | AUZ.AX | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 62.43% | 30.00% |
1Y Return | 87.20% | -7.14% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 3.11% | -62.04% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 29.15% | -37.34% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 32.65% | -13.16% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.67 | -0.10 |
Sortino Ratio | 2.04 | 0.85 |
Omega Ratio | 1.29 | 1.11 |
Calmar Ratio | 2.02 | -0.13 |
Martin Ratio | 10.42 | -0.27 |
Ulcer Index | 8.82% | 49.77% |
Daily Std Dev | 54.83% | 131.11% |
Max Drawdown | -92.31% | -99.99% |
Current Drawdown | -16.58% | -99.97% |
Fundamentals
WAF.AX | AUZ.AX | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | A$1.75B | A$19.58M |
EPS | A$0.15 | A$0.00 |
PEG Ratio | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | A$691.19M | A$148.00K |
Gross Profit (TTM) | A$291.56M | A$142.00K |
EBITDA (TTM) | A$348.47M | -A$2.20M |
Correlation
The correlation between WAF.AX and AUZ.AX is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
WAF.AX vs. AUZ.AX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, WAF.AX achieves a 62.43% return, which is significantly higher than AUZ.AX's 30.00% return. Over the past 10 years, WAF.AX has outperformed AUZ.AX with an annualized return of 32.65%, while AUZ.AX has yielded a comparatively lower -13.16% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WAF.AX vs. AUZ.AX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for West African Resources Limited (WAF.AX) and Australian Mines Limited (AUZ.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WAF.AX vs. AUZ.AX - Dividend Comparison
Neither WAF.AX nor AUZ.AX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
WAF.AX vs. AUZ.AX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WAF.AX drawdown since its inception was -92.31%, smaller than the maximum AUZ.AX drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAF.AX and AUZ.AX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WAF.AX vs. AUZ.AX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for West African Resources Limited (WAF.AX) is 13.12%, while Australian Mines Limited (AUZ.AX) has a volatility of 43.07%. This indicates that WAF.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUZ.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
WAF.AX vs. AUZ.AX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between West African Resources Limited and Australian Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities