WABC vs. NFG
WABC (Westamerica Bancorporation) and NFG (National Fuel Gas Company) are both stocks. WABC operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while NFG operates in Oil & Gas Integrated (Energy). Over the past 10 years, WABC returned 5.80%/yr vs 7.52%/yr for NFG. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
WABC vs. NFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WABC achieves a 28.02% return, which is significantly higher than NFG's 4.13% return. Over the past 10 years, WABC has underperformed NFG with an annualized return of 5.80%, while NFG has yielded a comparatively higher 7.52% annualized return.
WABC
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 21.06%
- YTD
- 28.02%
- 1Y
- 31.95%
- 3Y*
- 11.07%
- 5Y*
- 4.99%
- 10Y*
- 5.80%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.57%
NFG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 3.74%
- 6M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- 4.13%
- 1Y
- -2.59%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- 13.33%
- 10Y*
- 7.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.48%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $58.89M | $56.86M | $61.39M | |
| $10.79M | $11.84M | $11.46M |
WABC vs. NFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WABC Westamerica Bancorporation | 28.02% | -5.36% | -3.61% | -0.81% | 5.18% | 7.41% | -16.14% | 24.87% | -3.92% | -2.67% |
NFG National Fuel Gas Company | 4.13% | 35.31% | 25.38% | -17.71% | 1.87% | 60.66% | -7.58% | -5.94% | -3.74% | -0.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between WABC and NFG is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1992 | 0.30 |
The correlation between WABC and NFG shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WABC:
$1.41B
NFG:
$7.82B
WABC:
$4.53
NFG:
$7.24
WABC:
13.27
NFG:
11.38
WABC:
1.12
NFG:
0.08
WABC:
5.54
NFG:
3.07
WABC:
1.64
NFG:
1.98
WABC:
$265.72M
NFG:
$2.50B
WABC:
$252.29M
NFG:
$1.23B
WABC:
$152.94M
NFG:
$1.52B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WABC vs. NFG — Risk / Return Rank
WABC
NFG
WABC vs. NFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) and National Fuel Gas Company (NFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WABC | NFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.99 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | -0.13 | +2.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.60 | -0.24 | +8.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WABC vs. NFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WABC drawdown since its inception was -46.86%, smaller than the maximum NFG drawdown of -55.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WABC and NFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WABC | NFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.86% | -55.49% | +8.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.70% | -20.93% | +10.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.68% | -20.93% | -3.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.77% | -35.74% | -5.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.77% | -44.28% | +3.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.70% | -13.63% | +9.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.43% | -14.35% | +2.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 11.43% | -7.89% |
Volatility
WABC vs. NFG - Volatility Comparison
Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) at 6.54%. This indicates that WABC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WABC | NFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.07% | 6.54% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.44% | 14.53% | -2.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.65% | 19.62% | +1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.32% | 22.24% | +3.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.94% | 24.05% | +2.89% |
Dividends
WABC vs. NFG - Dividend Comparison
WABC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, more than NFG's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFG National Fuel Gas Company | 2.62% | 2.65% | 3.36% | 3.91% | 2.97% | 2.83% | 4.30% | 3.72% | 3.30% | 3.00% | 2.84% | 3.67% |
WABC Westamerica Bancorporation | 3.09% | 3.81% | 3.35% | 3.05% | 2.85% | 2.86% | 2.97% | 2.41% | 2.87% | 2.64% | 2.48% | 3.27% |
Financials
WABC vs. NFG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Westamerica Bancorporation and National Fuel Gas Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WABC vs. NFG - Profitability Comparison
WABC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Westamerica Bancorporation reported a gross profit of 62.77M and revenue of 66.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.0%.
NFG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, National Fuel Gas Company reported a gross profit of 231.42M and revenue of 537.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.1%.
WABC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Westamerica Bancorporation reported an operating income of 36.73M and revenue of 66.09M, resulting in an operating margin of 55.6%.
NFG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, National Fuel Gas Company reported an operating income of 208.94M and revenue of 537.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 38.9%.
WABC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Westamerica Bancorporation reported a net income of 27.39M and revenue of 66.09M, resulting in a net margin of 41.4%.
NFG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, National Fuel Gas Company reported a net income of 138.62M and revenue of 537.50M, resulting in a net margin of 25.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WABC and NFG have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WABC has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to NFG (6.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WABC dropped -46.86% vs NFG's -55.49%.
WABC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WABC and NFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer