VWRL.L vs. SSAC.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L).
VWRL.L and SSAC.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VWRL.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on May 22, 2012. SSAC.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Oct 21, 2011. Both VWRL.L and SSAC.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VWRL.L or SSAC.L.
Key characteristics
| VWRL.L | SSAC.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 11.97% | 11.76% |
| 1Y Return | 19.15% | 18.88% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.94% | 7.60% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.93% | 10.49% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 11.96% | 11.20% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.91 | 1.83 |
| Daily Std Dev | 9.70% | 9.98% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.98% | -25.43% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.03% | -1.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWRL.L and SSAC.L is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VWRL.L vs. SSAC.L - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VWRL.L having a 11.97% return and SSAC.L slightly lower at 11.76%. Over the past 10 years, VWRL.L has outperformed SSAC.L with an annualized return of 11.96%, while SSAC.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.20% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VWRL.L vs. SSAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWRL.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than SSAC.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VWRL.L vs. SSAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VWRL.L vs. SSAC.L - Dividend Comparison
VWRL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, while SSAC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWRL.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing | 1.56% | 1.73% | 2.04% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.95% | 2.23% | 1.90% | 1.85% | 1.98% | 2.14% | 1.95% |
SSAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
VWRL.L vs. SSAC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWRL.L drawdown since its inception was -24.98%, roughly equal to the maximum SSAC.L drawdown of -25.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRL.L and SSAC.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VWRL.L vs. SSAC.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) have volatilities of 5.07% and 5.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.