VWRA.L vs. IDTP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) and iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IDTP.L).
VWRA.L and IDTP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VWRA.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Jul 23, 2019. IDTP.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. It was launched on Dec 8, 2006. Both VWRA.L and IDTP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VWRA.L or IDTP.L.
Key characteristics
| VWRA.L | IDTP.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 14.84% | 4.97% |
| 1Y Return | 22.43% | 7.91% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.71% | -1.29% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.14% | 2.53% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.91 | 1.39 |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.99% | 5.85% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.62% | -15.12% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.61% | -5.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWRA.L and IDTP.L is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
VWRA.L vs. IDTP.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, VWRA.L achieves a 14.84% return, which is significantly higher than IDTP.L's 4.97% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VWRA.L vs. IDTP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWRA.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than IDTP.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VWRA.L vs. IDTP.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) and iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IDTP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VWRA.L vs. IDTP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VWRA.L nor IDTP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
VWRA.L vs. IDTP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWRA.L drawdown since its inception was -33.62%, which is greater than IDTP.L's maximum drawdown of -15.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRA.L and IDTP.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VWRA.L vs. IDTP.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IDTP.L) at 1.45%. This indicates that VWRA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDTP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.