PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
VVL.TO vs. ZEA.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between VVL.TO and ZEA.TO is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

VVL.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO) and BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.85%
0.50%
VVL.TO
ZEA.TO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

VVL.TO:

1.32

ZEA.TO:

1.50

Sortino Ratio

VVL.TO:

1.93

ZEA.TO:

2.12

Omega Ratio

VVL.TO:

1.25

ZEA.TO:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

VVL.TO:

1.85

ZEA.TO:

2.55

Martin Ratio

VVL.TO:

5.52

ZEA.TO:

8.18

Ulcer Index

VVL.TO:

3.11%

ZEA.TO:

1.97%

Daily Std Dev

VVL.TO:

12.99%

ZEA.TO:

10.70%

Max Drawdown

VVL.TO:

-43.93%

ZEA.TO:

-27.80%

Current Drawdown

VVL.TO:

-2.03%

ZEA.TO:

-0.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VVL.TO achieves a 3.91% return, which is significantly lower than ZEA.TO's 7.13% return.


VVL.TO

YTD

3.91%

1M

-0.24%

6M

8.51%

1Y

17.17%

5Y*

12.87%

10Y*

N/A

ZEA.TO

YTD

7.13%

1M

3.75%

6M

6.64%

1Y

16.29%

5Y*

8.19%

10Y*

6.65%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VVL.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VVL.TO has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than ZEA.TO's 0.22% expense ratio.


VVL.TO
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD
Expense ratio chart for VVL.TO: current value at 0.38% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.38%
Expense ratio chart for ZEA.TO: current value at 0.22% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.22%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

VVL.TO vs. ZEA.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VVL.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VVL.TO is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VVL.TO is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VVL.TO is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VVL.TO is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VVL.TO is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VVL.TO is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

ZEA.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ZEA.TO is 6666
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ZEA.TO is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ZEA.TO is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ZEA.TO is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ZEA.TO is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ZEA.TO is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

VVL.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO) and BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VVL.TO, currently valued at 0.84, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.840.85
The chart of Sortino ratio for VVL.TO, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.241.25
The chart of Omega ratio for VVL.TO, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.151.15
The chart of Calmar ratio for VVL.TO, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.311.11
The chart of Martin ratio for VVL.TO, currently valued at 3.26, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.003.262.54
VVL.TO
ZEA.TO

The current VVL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the ZEA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VVL.TO and ZEA.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.84
0.85
VVL.TO
ZEA.TO

Dividends

VVL.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Dividend Comparison

VVL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, less than ZEA.TO's 2.60% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
VVL.TO
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD
2.11%2.19%2.65%2.52%1.48%1.67%2.60%2.11%1.33%0.59%0.00%0.00%
ZEA.TO
BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF
2.60%2.78%3.02%3.08%2.49%2.74%2.95%3.05%2.40%2.80%2.43%2.37%

Drawdowns

VVL.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VVL.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.93%, which is greater than ZEA.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVL.TO and ZEA.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-3.24%
-1.16%
VVL.TO
ZEA.TO

Volatility

VVL.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO) is 2.40%, while BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA.TO) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that VVL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZEA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.40%
2.81%
VVL.TO
ZEA.TO
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab