VUTY.L vs. IBTS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUTY.L) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L).
VUTY.L and IBTS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VUTY.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Government TR USD. It was launched on Feb 24, 2016. IBTS.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index. It was launched on Jun 2, 2006. Both VUTY.L and IBTS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VUTY.L or IBTS.L.
Key characteristics
VUTY.L | IBTS.L | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | -3.19% | 0.50% |
1Y Return | -2.08% | -1.42% |
3Y Return (Ann) | -2.02% | 2.43% |
5Y Return (Ann) | -0.91% | 1.10% |
Sharpe Ratio | -0.38 | -0.26 |
Sortino Ratio | -0.51 | -0.30 |
Omega Ratio | 0.94 | 0.96 |
Calmar Ratio | -0.12 | -0.15 |
Martin Ratio | -0.90 | -0.80 |
Ulcer Index | 2.79% | 2.46% |
Daily Std Dev | 6.57% | 7.67% |
Max Drawdown | -21.34% | -18.99% |
Current Drawdown | -19.79% | -10.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUTY.L and IBTS.L is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VUTY.L vs. IBTS.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, VUTY.L achieves a -3.19% return, which is significantly lower than IBTS.L's 0.50% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VUTY.L vs. IBTS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VUTY.L and IBTS.L have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VUTY.L vs. IBTS.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUTY.L) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VUTY.L vs. IBTS.L - Dividend Comparison
VUTY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than IBTS.L's 2.67% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Distributing | 1.35% | 4.34% | 2.52% | 1.64% | 2.10% | 3.09% | 2.97% | 2.13% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF | 2.67% | 3.79% | 0.88% | 0.85% | 2.33% | 3.05% | 2.01% | 1.31% | 0.91% | 0.76% | 0.42% | 0.30% |
Drawdowns
VUTY.L vs. IBTS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUTY.L drawdown since its inception was -21.34%, which is greater than IBTS.L's maximum drawdown of -18.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUTY.L and IBTS.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VUTY.L vs. IBTS.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUTY.L) has a higher volatility of 1.79% compared to iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L) at 1.14%. This indicates that VUTY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.