VUN.TO vs. VFVA
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard US Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA).
VUN.TO and VFVA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VUN.TO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Total Market Index. It was launched on Aug 2, 2013. VFVA is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Feb 13, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VUN.TO or VFVA.
Key characteristics
| VUN.TO | VFVA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 21.36% | 6.69% |
| 1Y Return | 34.10% | 22.42% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 10.58% | 8.63% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 15.22% | 13.09% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.96 | 1.32 |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.08% | 16.97% |
| Max Drawdown | -28.19% | -48.58% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.69% | -3.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUN.TO and VFVA is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VUN.TO vs. VFVA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, VUN.TO achieves a 21.36% return, which is significantly higher than VFVA's 6.69% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VUN.TO vs. VFVA - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUN.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than VFVA's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VUN.TO vs. VFVA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard US Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VUN.TO vs. VFVA - Dividend Comparison
VUN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than VFVA's 2.39% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUN.TO Vanguard US Total Market Index ETF | 0.77% | 1.10% | 1.21% | 0.97% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.52% | 1.39% | 1.50% | 1.49% | 1.32% | 0.63% |
VFVA Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF | 2.39% | 2.45% | 2.21% | 1.68% | 2.04% | 2.08% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
VUN.TO vs. VFVA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUN.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.19%, smaller than the maximum VFVA drawdown of -48.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUN.TO and VFVA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VUN.TO vs. VFVA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard US Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO) is 3.83%, while Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that VUN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.