VUN.TO vs. VFVA
VUN.TO (Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF) and VFVA (Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VUN.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index CAD, while VFVA is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard. VUN.TO is passively managed, while VFVA is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VUN.TO returned 15.50%/yr vs 12.61%/yr for VFVA. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VUN.TO charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFVA.
Performance
VUN.TO vs. VFVA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VUN.TO is traded in CAD, while VFVA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VFVA values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUN.TO achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly higher than VFVA's 10.90% return.
VUN.TO
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 7.17%
- YTD
- 12.43%
- 6M
- 10.44%
- 1Y
- 29.34%
- 3Y*
- 23.05%
- 5Y*
- 15.50%
- 10Y*
- 15.43%
VFVA
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- 10.90%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 30.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- —
VUN.TO vs. VFVA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUN.TO Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF | 12.43% | 11.43% | 33.76% | 23.00% | -14.20% | 24.54% | 18.22% | 23.99% | 1.18% |
VFVA Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF | 10.90% | 9.51% | 16.92% | 14.78% | 2.88% | 35.70% | 0.55% | 19.26% | -7.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUN.TO and VFVA is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018 | 0.68 |
The correlation between VUN.TO and VFVA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
VUN.TO vs. VFVA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VUN.TO
VFVA
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VUN.TO
VFVA
Financial Services
VUN.TO
VFVA
Healthcare
VUN.TO
VFVA
Consumer Cyclical
VUN.TO
VFVA
Industrials
VUN.TO
VFVA
Communication Services
VUN.TO
VFVA
Consumer Defensive
VUN.TO
VFVA
Energy
VUN.TO
VFVA
Utilities
VUN.TO
VFVA
-
Real Estate
VUN.TO
VFVA
Basic Materials
VUN.TO
VFVA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUN.TO vs. VFVA — Risk / Return Rank
VUN.TO
VFVA
VUN.TO vs. VFVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VUN.TO | VFVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.35 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 3.68 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.96 | 12.51 | +0.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VUN.TO | VFVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 2.01 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | 0.71 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 0.54 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
VUN.TO vs. VFVA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUN.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.19%, smaller than the maximum VFVA drawdown of -42.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUN.TO and VFVA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUN.TO | VFVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.19% | -42.82% | +14.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.51% | -8.22% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.88% | -22.56% | +2.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.67% | -22.56% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -0.92% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.80% | -6.15% | +2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 2.42% | -0.15% |
Volatility
VUN.TO vs. VFVA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO) is 3.04%, while Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) has a volatility of 3.25%. This indicates that VUN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUN.TO | VFVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.04% | 3.25% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.81% | 10.04% | -1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.97% | 15.15% | -3.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.43% | 17.96% | -2.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 21.89% | -5.19% |
VUN.TO vs. VFVA - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUN.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than VFVA's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VUN.TO vs. VFVA - Dividend Comparison
VUN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than VFVA's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFVA Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF | 1.95% | 2.13% | 2.40% | 2.45% | 2.21% | 1.68% | 2.04% | 2.08% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUN.TO Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF | 0.74% | 0.84% | 0.93% | 1.10% | 1.21% | 0.97% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.52% | 1.39% | 1.49% | 1.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VUN.TO and VFVA have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VFVA is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VFVA is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for VUN.TO.
VUN.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VFVA is Mid Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for VUN.TO and 0.13% for VFVA.
Find the right allocation for VUN.TO and VFVA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer