VUG vs. VONG
VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) and VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Vanguard - VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index while VONG tracks the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VUG returned 17.81%/yr vs 18.20%/yr for VONG. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VUG charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VONG.
Performance
VUG vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUG achieves a 5.80% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 3.90% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VUG having a 17.81% annualized return and VONG not far ahead at 18.20%.
VUG
- 1D
- -3.62%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 5.80%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- 1Y
- 23.98%
- 3Y*
- 24.49%
- 5Y*
- 14.33%
- 10Y*
- 17.81%
VONG
- 1D
- -3.25%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 3.90%
- 6M
- 2.81%
- 1Y
- 22.26%
- 3Y*
- 23.65%
- 5Y*
- 14.66%
- 10Y*
- 18.20%
VUG vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 5.80% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 27.72% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 3.90% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -29.18% | 27.60% | 38.30% | 36.06% | -1.53% | 30.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUG and VONG is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010 | 0.98 |
The correlation between VUG and VONG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
VUG vs. VONG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VUG
VONG
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
VUG
VONG
Communication Services
VUG
VONG
Consumer Cyclical
VUG
VONG
Healthcare
VUG
VONG
Financial Services
VUG
VONG
Industrials
VUG
VONG
Consumer Defensive
VUG
VONG
Real Estate
VUG
VONG
Utilities
VUG
VONG
Basic Materials
VUG
VONG
Energy
VUG
VONG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUG vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank
VUG
VONG
VUG vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VUG | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.25 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 1.38 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.09 | 4.61 | +0.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VUG | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 1.42 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.69 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.87 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.89 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
VUG vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUG drawdown since its inception was -50.68%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUG and VONG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUG | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.68% | -32.72% | -17.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.53% | -16.23% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.85% | -23.27% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.61% | -32.72% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.61% | -32.72% | -2.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.83% | -4.66% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.09% | -4.88% | -2.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.72% | 4.84% | -0.12% |
Volatility
VUG vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) at 4.78%. This indicates that VUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUG | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 4.78% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.68% | 12.08% | +0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.26% | 15.72% | +0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.27% | 21.37% | +0.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.47% | 20.89% | +0.58% |
VUG vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VUG vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than VONG's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, VUG and VONG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VUG has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to VONG (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VUG dropped -50.68% vs VONG's -32.72%.
On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.20% vs 17.81% for VUG. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VONG has been the lower-risk option at 4.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.20% return vs 17.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VONG.
VONG has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.39% for VUG.
VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, while VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VUG and 0.06% for VONG.
VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VUG and VONG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer