VTWG vs. VFVA
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA).
VTWG and VFVA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VTWG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010. VFVA is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Feb 13, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VTWG or VFVA.
Correlation
The correlation between VTWG and VFVA is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VTWG vs. VFVA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
VTWG:
0.83
VFVA:
0.51
VTWG:
1.27
VFVA:
0.84
VTWG:
1.15
VFVA:
1.10
VTWG:
0.65
VFVA:
0.91
VTWG:
4.30
VFVA:
2.38
VTWG:
4.17%
VFVA:
3.52%
VTWG:
21.69%
VFVA:
16.51%
VTWG:
-42.07%
VFVA:
-48.58%
VTWG:
-11.86%
VFVA:
-9.15%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTWG achieves a 15.36% return, which is significantly higher than VFVA's 6.75% return.
VTWG
15.36%
-1.78%
11.24%
15.85%
6.91%
8.18%
VFVA
6.75%
-5.71%
6.65%
6.73%
11.08%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VTWG vs. VFVA - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTWG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VFVA's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VTWG vs. VFVA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VTWG vs. VFVA - Dividend Comparison
VTWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than VFVA's 1.77% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 0.36% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.54% | 0.48% | 0.72% | 0.72% | 0.64% | 0.96% | 0.72% | 0.62% | 0.56% |
VFVA Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF | 1.77% | 2.45% | 2.21% | 1.68% | 2.04% | 2.09% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
VTWG vs. VFVA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTWG drawdown since its inception was -42.07%, smaller than the maximum VFVA drawdown of -48.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWG and VFVA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VTWG vs. VFVA - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) has a higher volatility of 6.68% compared to Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) at 4.60%. This indicates that VTWG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.