VTWG vs. IWM
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM).
VTWG and IWM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VTWG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010. IWM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both VTWG and IWM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VTWG or IWM.
Key characteristics
| VTWG | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 0.94% | -0.14% |
| 1Y Return | 15.20% | 17.60% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -5.28% | -2.74% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 5.12% | 5.88% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 7.79% | 7.42% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.82 | 0.91 |
| Daily Std Dev | 19.81% | 19.79% |
| Max Drawdown | -42.07% | -59.05% |
| Current Drawdown | -22.88% | -14.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTWG and IWM is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VTWG vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, VTWG achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's -0.14% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTWG having a 7.79% annualized return and IWM not far behind at 7.42%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VTWG vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTWG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VTWG vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VTWG vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
VTWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than IWM's 1.30% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 0.75% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.54% | 0.48% | 0.72% | 0.72% | 0.64% | 0.96% | 0.72% | 0.62% | 0.56% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 1.30% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% | 1.26% | 1.23% |
Drawdowns
VTWG vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTWG drawdown since its inception was -42.07%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWG and IWM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VTWG vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) has a higher volatility of 5.89% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 5.53%. This indicates that VTWG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.