PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTS vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTS vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vitesse Energy Inc (VTS) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTS achieves a -12.06% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 8.20% return.


VTS

1D
0.94%
1M
-8.60%
YTD
-12.06%
6M
-11.79%
1Y
-20.91%
3Y*
0.25%
5Y*
10Y*

IVV

1D
-1.42%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
8.20%
6M
7.25%
1Y
23.72%
3Y*
20.79%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTS vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VTS
Vitesse Energy Inc
-12.06%-15.20%24.25%59.99%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
8.20%17.85%24.93%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between VTS and IVV is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2023

0.23

Over the past year, the correlation between VTS and IVV has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.23, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTS vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTS
VTS Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
VTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTS Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
VTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTS Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTS vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vitesse Energy Inc (VTS) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTSIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.35

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.61

2.68

-3.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.07

11.98

-13.04

VTS vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTS Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTS and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTS vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTS drawdown since its inception was -34.30%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTS and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTSIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.30%

-55.25%

+20.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.30%

-8.89%

-25.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.30%

-18.75%

-15.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.68%

-3.14%

-30.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.54%

-10.76%

+0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.64%

1.99%

+17.65%

Volatility

VTS vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

Vitesse Energy Inc (VTS) has a higher volatility of 11.10% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 4.88%. This indicates that VTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTSIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.10%

4.88%

+6.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.85%

9.85%

+16.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.34%

12.48%

+20.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.34%

16.98%

+19.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.34%

18.07%

+18.27%

Dividends

VTS vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

VTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.39%, more than IVV's 1.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.11%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%
VTS
Vitesse Energy Inc
12.39%11.68%8.30%9.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTS and IVV have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTS has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to IVV (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTS dropped -34.30% vs IVV's -55.25%.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTS and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer