VTS vs. COP
VTS (Vitesse Energy Inc) and COP (ConocoPhillips Company) are both stocks. Both operate in the Oil & Gas E&P industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 3 years, VTS returned 0.25%/yr vs 6.51%/yr for COP. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
VTS vs. COP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTS achieves a -12.06% return, which is significantly lower than COP's 19.27% return.
VTS
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -8.60%
- YTD
- -12.06%
- 6M
- -11.79%
- 1Y
- -20.91%
- 3Y*
- 0.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COP
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -8.71%
- YTD
- 19.27%
- 6M
- 20.40%
- 1Y
- 23.89%
- 3Y*
- 6.51%
- 5Y*
- 16.48%
- 10Y*
- 13.26%
VTS vs. COP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VTS Vitesse Energy Inc | -12.06% | -15.20% | 24.25% | 59.99% |
COP ConocoPhillips Company | 19.27% | -2.34% | -12.02% | -0.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTS and COP is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2023 | 0.59 |
The correlation between VTS and COP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
VTS:
$646.83M
COP:
$134.71B
VTS:
-$0.49
COP:
$5.90
VTS:
2.34
COP:
2.34
VTS:
1.13
COP:
2.09
VTS:
$275.23M
COP:
$58.31B
VTS:
$31.71M
COP:
$17.02B
VTS:
$138.51M
COP:
$22.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTS vs. COP — Risk / Return Rank
VTS
COP
VTS vs. COP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vitesse Energy Inc (VTS) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTS | COP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.15 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | 1.27 | -1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | 3.35 | -4.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTS vs. COP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTS drawdown since its inception was -34.30%, smaller than the maximum COP drawdown of -84.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTS and COP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTS | COP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.30% | -84.55% | +50.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.30% | -18.88% | -15.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.30% | -36.19% | +1.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.68% | -17.20% | -16.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.54% | -25.48% | +14.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.64% | 7.16% | +12.48% |
Volatility
VTS vs. COP - Volatility Comparison
Vitesse Energy Inc (VTS) has a higher volatility of 11.10% compared to ConocoPhillips Company (COP) at 9.12%. This indicates that VTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTS | COP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.10% | 9.12% | +1.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.85% | 22.71% | +3.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.34% | 29.59% | +3.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.34% | 32.77% | +3.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.34% | 37.62% | -1.28% |
Dividends
VTS vs. COP - Dividend Comparison
VTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.39%, more than COP's 3.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COP ConocoPhillips Company | 3.00% | 3.40% | 3.35% | 3.37% | 4.23% | 2.70% | 4.23% | 2.05% | 1.86% | 1.93% | 1.99% | 6.30% |
VTS Vitesse Energy Inc | 12.39% | 11.68% | 8.30% | 9.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
VTS vs. COP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vitesse Energy Inc and ConocoPhillips Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
VTS vs. COP - Profitability Comparison
VTS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vitesse Energy Inc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 67.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
COP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a gross profit of 7.50B and revenue of 16.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.7%.
VTS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vitesse Energy Inc reported an operating income of 5.91M and revenue of 67.41M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.
COP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported an operating income of 3.36B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.
VTS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vitesse Energy Inc reported a net income of -42.28M and revenue of 67.41M, resulting in a net margin of -62.7%.
COP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
VTS and COP have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTS has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to COP (9.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTS dropped -34.30% vs COP's -84.55%.
COP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTS and COP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer