PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTS vs. COP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VTS vs. COP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vitesse Energy Inc (VTS) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTS achieves a -6.29% return, which is significantly lower than COP's 29.12% return.


VTS

1D
-3.23%
1M
-7.49%
YTD
-6.29%
6M
-15.12%
1Y
-10.55%
3Y*
-1.56%
5Y*
10Y*

COP

1D
1.87%
1M
-3.98%
YTD
29.12%
6M
31.65%
1Y
39.91%
3Y*
8.69%
5Y*
18.95%
10Y*
13.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTS vs. COP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VTS
Vitesse Energy Inc
-6.29%-15.20%24.25%66.54%
COP
ConocoPhillips Company
29.12%-2.34%-12.02%0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between VTS and COP is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2023

0.58

The correlation between VTS and COP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VTS:

$707.35M

COP:

$145.83B

EPS

VTS:

-$0.49

COP:

$5.90

PS Ratio

VTS:

2.56

COP:

2.53

PB Ratio

VTS:

1.24

COP:

2.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

VTS:

$275.23M

COP:

$58.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VTS:

$31.71M

COP:

$17.02B

EBITDA (TTM)

VTS:

$138.51M

COP:

$22.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTS vs. COP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTS
VTS Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTS Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
VTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTS Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

COP
COP Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
COP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
COP Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
COP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
COP Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTS vs. COP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vitesse Energy Inc (VTS) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTSCOPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.32

1.37

-1.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.24

1.92

-2.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.22

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

2.69

-3.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.58

6.13

-6.71

VTS vs. COP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTS Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the COP Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTS and COP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTSCOPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.32

1.37

-1.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.23

+0.21

Drawdowns

VTS vs. COP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTS drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, smaller than the maximum COP drawdown of -84.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTS and COP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTSCOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.97%

-84.55%

+52.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.97%

-14.90%

-17.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.97%

-36.19%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.33%

-10.36%

-18.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.22%

-25.49%

+15.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.29%

6.53%

+11.76%

Volatility

VTS vs. COP - Volatility Comparison

Vitesse Energy Inc (VTS) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP) have volatilities of 9.15% and 8.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTSCOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.15%

8.92%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.15%

22.81%

+2.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.83%

29.27%

+3.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.29%

32.72%

+3.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.29%

37.67%

-1.38%

Dividends

VTS vs. COP - Dividend Comparison

VTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.04%, more than COP's 2.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COP
ConocoPhillips Company
2.77%3.40%3.35%3.37%4.23%2.70%4.23%2.05%1.86%1.93%1.99%6.30%
VTS
Vitesse Energy Inc
12.04%11.68%8.30%9.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

VTS vs. COP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vitesse Energy Inc and ConocoPhillips Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
67.41M
16.05B
(VTS) Total Revenue
(COP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

VTS vs. COP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Vitesse Energy Inc and ConocoPhillips Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
46.7%
Portfolio components
VTS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vitesse Energy Inc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 67.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

COP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a gross profit of 7.50B and revenue of 16.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.7%.

VTS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vitesse Energy Inc reported an operating income of 5.91M and revenue of 67.41M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.

COP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported an operating income of 3.36B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.

VTS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vitesse Energy Inc reported a net income of -42.28M and revenue of 67.41M, resulting in a net margin of -62.7%.

COP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VTS and COP have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTS has higher volatility (9.15%) compared to COP (8.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTS dropped -31.97% vs COP's -84.55%.

COP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTS and COP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer