VTS vs. COP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Vitesse Energy Inc (VTS) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP).

Performance

VTS vs. COP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vitesse Energy Inc (VTS) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

VTS vs. COP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
VTS Vitesse Energy Inc	-3.58%	-15.20%	24.25%	66.54%
COP ConocoPhillips Company	42.11%	-2.34%	-12.02%	0.08%

Fundamentals

Market Cap VTS : $718.28M COP : $162.88B
EPS VTS : $0.63 COP : $6.39
PE Ratio VTS : 28.66 COP : 20.64
PEG Ratio VTS : 0.19 COP : 1.20
PS Ratio VTS : 2.64 COP : 2.76
PB Ratio VTS : 1.14 COP : 2.53
Total Revenue (TTM) VTS : $273.99M COP : $59.65B
Gross Profit (TTM) VTS : $157.41M COP : $17.61B
EBITDA (TTM) VTS : $180.56M COP : $25.38B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTS achieves a -3.58% return, which is significantly lower than COP's 42.11% return.

VTS

• 1D: -1.57%
• 1M: -3.83%
• YTD: -3.58%
• 6M: -17.93%
• 1Y: -18.82%
• 3Y*: 7.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COP

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 16.34%
• YTD: 42.11%
• 6M: 41.94%
• 1Y: 30.00%
• 3Y*: 13.58%
• 5Y*: 23.95%
• 10Y*: 16.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

VTS vs. COP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTS

VTS Risk / Return Rank: 19
VTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
VTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
VTS Omega Ratio Rank: 20
VTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
VTS Martin Ratio Rank: 19

COP

COP Risk / Return Rank: 68
COP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
COP Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
COP Omega Ratio Rank: 65
COP Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
COP Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTS vs. COP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vitesse Energy Inc (VTS) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VTS	COP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.50	0.88	-1.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.48	1.32	-1.80
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.18	-0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.70	1.51	-2.21
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.21	2.91	-4.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VTS vs. COP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTS Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the COP Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTS and COP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VTS	COP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.50	0.88	-1.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.43	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.23	+0.26

Correlation

The correlation between VTS and COP is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

VTS vs. COP - Dividend Comparison

VTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.70%, more than COP's 2.45% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VTS Vitesse Energy Inc	11.70%	11.68%	8.30%	9.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
COP ConocoPhillips Company	2.45%	3.40%	3.35%	3.37%	4.23%	2.70%	4.23%	2.05%	1.86%	1.93%	1.99%	6.30%

Drawdowns

VTS vs. COP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTS drawdown since its inception was -27.29%, smaller than the maximum COP drawdown of -84.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTS and COP.

Drawdown Indicators

	VTS	COP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.29%	-84.55%	+57.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.29%	-22.09%	-5.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-36.19%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-70.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.29%	-1.35%	-25.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.29%	-25.55%	+16.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.85%	11.45%	+4.40%

Volatility

VTS vs. COP - Volatility Comparison

Vitesse Energy Inc (VTS) has a higher volatility of 11.31% compared to ConocoPhillips Company (COP) at 6.82%. This indicates that VTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VTS	COP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.31%	6.82%	+4.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.45%	20.55%	+2.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.52%	34.39%	+3.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.49%	32.78%	+3.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.49%	37.68%	-1.19%

Financials