PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTMNX vs. BRGNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTMNX vs. BRGNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Institutional Shares (VTMNX) and iShares Russell 1000 Large-Cap Index Fund (BRGNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTMNX achieves a 15.93% return, which is significantly higher than BRGNX's 11.36% return. Over the past 10 years, VTMNX has underperformed BRGNX with an annualized return of 10.26%, while BRGNX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.21% annualized return.


VTMNX

1D
0.26%
1M
6.02%
YTD
15.93%
6M
19.14%
1Y
33.56%
3Y*
20.22%
5Y*
9.97%
10Y*
10.26%

BRGNX

1D
0.19%
1M
5.70%
YTD
11.36%
6M
11.30%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
13.39%
10Y*
15.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTMNX vs. BRGNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTMNX
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Institutional Shares
15.93%35.16%2.99%17.82%-15.36%11.40%10.26%22.13%-14.51%26.45%
BRGNX
iShares Russell 1000 Large-Cap Index Fund
11.36%17.22%24.36%26.43%-19.15%26.14%20.79%31.30%-4.89%21.47%

Correlation

The correlation between VTMNX and BRGNX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2011

0.80

The correlation between VTMNX and BRGNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTMNX vs. BRGNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTMNX
VTMNX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VTMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VTMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

BRGNX
BRGNX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
BRGNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRGNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRGNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BRGNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRGNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTMNX vs. BRGNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Institutional Shares (VTMNX) and iShares Russell 1000 Large-Cap Index Fund (BRGNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTMNXBRGNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.17

2.42

-0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.95

3.29

-0.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.44

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

3.27

-0.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.90

15.09

-4.18

VTMNX vs. BRGNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTMNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the BRGNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTMNX and BRGNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTMNXBRGNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

2.42

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.78

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.84

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.80

-0.48

Drawdowns

VTMNX vs. BRGNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTMNX drawdown since its inception was -60.57%, which is greater than BRGNX's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTMNX and BRGNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTMNXBRGNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.57%

-34.59%

-25.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.69%

-8.86%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.16%

-19.15%

+5.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-25.14%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.60%

-34.59%

-1.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.22%

-4.01%

-9.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

1.91%

+1.09%

Volatility

VTMNX vs. BRGNX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Institutional Shares (VTMNX) has a higher volatility of 4.98% compared to iShares Russell 1000 Large-Cap Index Fund (BRGNX) at 2.85%. This indicates that VTMNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRGNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTMNXBRGNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.98%

2.85%

+2.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.55%

9.04%

+3.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.13%

11.97%

+3.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.88%

17.18%

-1.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.52%

18.21%

-1.69%

VTMNX vs. BRGNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTMNX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BRGNX's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTMNX vs. BRGNX - Dividend Comparison

VTMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than BRGNX's 2.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRGNX
iShares Russell 1000 Large-Cap Index Fund
2.45%2.71%1.32%1.44%1.77%1.83%1.46%2.76%2.40%2.59%3.92%5.41%
VTMNX
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Institutional Shares
2.60%3.22%3.36%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.05%3.35%2.77%3.06%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTMNX and BRGNX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTMNX has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to BRGNX (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTMNX dropped -60.57% vs BRGNX's -34.59%.

BRGNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTMNX and BRGNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer