PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTMGX vs. TISCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTMGX vs. TISCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTMGX) and TIAA-CREF Social Choice Equity Fund (TISCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTMGX achieves a 15.89% return, which is significantly higher than TISCX's 13.71% return. Over the past 10 years, VTMGX has underperformed TISCX with an annualized return of 10.24%, while TISCX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.46% annualized return.


VTMGX

1D
0.26%
1M
6.03%
YTD
15.89%
6M
19.15%
1Y
33.58%
3Y*
20.20%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*
10.24%

TISCX

1D
0.47%
1M
6.10%
YTD
13.71%
6M
14.34%
1Y
26.88%
3Y*
21.09%
5Y*
12.07%
10Y*
14.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTMGX vs. TISCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTMGX
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares
15.89%35.17%3.03%17.65%-15.33%11.39%10.25%22.04%-14.48%26.39%
TISCX
TIAA-CREF Social Choice Equity Fund
13.71%16.51%18.23%22.53%-17.80%26.54%20.34%31.55%-5.74%19.01%

Correlation

The correlation between VTMGX and TISCX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1999

0.73

The correlation between VTMGX and TISCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTMGX vs. TISCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTMGX
VTMGX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VTMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VTMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

TISCX
TISCX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
TISCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TISCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
TISCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TISCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
TISCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTMGX vs. TISCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTMGX) and TIAA-CREF Social Choice Equity Fund (TISCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTMGXTISCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.17

2.19

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.95

3.01

-0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.39

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

3.20

-0.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.88

13.41

-2.53

VTMGX vs. TISCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTMGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the TISCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTMGX and TISCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTMGXTISCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

2.19

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.63

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.75

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.42

-0.11

Drawdowns

VTMGX vs. TISCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTMGX drawdown since its inception was -60.58%, which is greater than TISCX's maximum drawdown of -54.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTMGX and TISCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTMGXTISCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.58%

-54.65%

-5.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.67%

-8.76%

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.18%

-28.29%

+15.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-28.29%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.68%

-34.89%

-0.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.66%

-10.09%

-4.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

2.08%

+0.93%

Volatility

VTMGX vs. TISCX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTMGX) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to TIAA-CREF Social Choice Equity Fund (TISCX) at 3.05%. This indicates that VTMGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TISCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTMGXTISCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

3.05%

+1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.53%

9.86%

+2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.11%

12.79%

+2.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.87%

19.31%

-3.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.54%

19.39%

-2.85%

VTMGX vs. TISCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTMGX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TISCX's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTMGX vs. TISCX - Dividend Comparison

VTMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than TISCX's 6.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TISCX
TIAA-CREF Social Choice Equity Fund
6.82%7.75%16.74%5.64%4.99%9.46%1.38%4.84%9.85%2.38%6.84%3.51%
VTMGX
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares
2.58%3.20%3.34%3.14%2.88%3.14%2.02%3.03%3.33%2.77%3.06%2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTMGX and TISCX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTMGX has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to TISCX (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTMGX dropped -60.58% vs TISCX's -54.65%.

TISCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTMGX and TISCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer