VTLE vs. PBF

In the year-to-date period, VTLE achieves a -48.84% return, which is significantly lower than PBF's -37.82% return. Over the past 10 years, VTLE has underperformed PBF with an annualized return of -25.76%, while PBF has yielded a comparatively higher -2.77% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vital Energy Inc. (VTLE) and PBF Energy Inc. (PBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current VTLE Sharpe Ratio is -1.17, which is comparable to the PBF Sharpe Ratio of -1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTLE and PBF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

VTLE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.44%.

The maximum VTLE drawdown since its inception was -98.99%, which is greater than PBF's maximum drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTLE and PBF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Vital Energy Inc. (VTLE) has a higher volatility of 41.36% compared to PBF Energy Inc. (PBF) at 27.01%. This indicates that VTLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vital Energy Inc. and PBF Energy Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.