VTLE vs. FANG
Compare and contrast key facts about Vital Energy Inc. (VTLE) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VTLE or FANG.
Correlation
The correlation between VTLE and FANG is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
VTLE vs. FANG - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
VTLE:
-1.03
FANG:
-0.69
VTLE:
-1.85
FANG:
-0.79
VTLE:
0.76
FANG:
0.89
VTLE:
-0.69
FANG:
-0.65
VTLE:
-1.62
FANG:
-1.45
VTLE:
42.10%
FANG:
18.82%
VTLE:
63.95%
FANG:
39.18%
VTLE:
-98.99%
FANG:
-88.72%
VTLE:
-97.47%
FANG:
-30.60%
Fundamentals
VTLE:
$621.16M
FANG:
$40.29B
VTLE:
-$4.74
FANG:
$16.08
VTLE:
0.32
FANG:
3.28
VTLE:
0.23
FANG:
1.05
VTLE:
$1.47B
FANG:
$12.87B
VTLE:
$716.54M
FANG:
$8.81B
VTLE:
$608.51M
FANG:
$8.98B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTLE achieves a -45.12% return, which is significantly lower than FANG's -12.15% return. Over the past 10 years, VTLE has underperformed FANG with an annualized return of -24.43%, while FANG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.68% annualized return.
VTLE
-45.12%
23.96%
-45.40%
-65.42%
0.44%
-24.43%
FANG
-12.15%
10.78%
-19.25%
-26.88%
36.25%
8.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VTLE vs. FANG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
VTLE
FANG
VTLE vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vital Energy Inc. (VTLE) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
VTLE vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison
VTLE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTLE Vital Energy Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 4.35% | 5.06% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% |
Drawdowns
VTLE vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTLE drawdown since its inception was -98.99%, which is greater than FANG's maximum drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTLE and FANG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
VTLE vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison
Vital Energy Inc. (VTLE) has a higher volatility of 23.11% compared to Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) at 12.36%. This indicates that VTLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
VTLE vs. FANG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vital Energy Inc. and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
VTLE vs. FANG - Profitability Comparison
VTLE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Vital Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of 156.27M and revenue of 534.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.2%.
FANG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.71B and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.6%.
VTLE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Vital Energy Inc. reported an operating income of -365.77M and revenue of 534.37M, resulting in an operating margin of -68.5%.
FANG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 17.00M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.4%.
VTLE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Vital Energy Inc. reported a net income of -359.39M and revenue of 534.37M, resulting in a net margin of -67.3%.
FANG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 1.41B and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 34.7%.