VTLE vs. FANG

In the year-to-date period, VTLE achieves a -37.59% return, which is significantly lower than FANG's 4.36% return. Over the past 10 years, VTLE has underperformed FANG with an annualized return of -18.26%, while FANG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.21% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vital Energy Inc. (VTLE) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current VTLE Sharpe Ratio is -0.87, which is lower than the FANG Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTLE and FANG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

VTLE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%.

The maximum VTLE drawdown since its inception was -98.99%, which is greater than FANG's maximum drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTLE and FANG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Vital Energy Inc. (VTLE) has a higher volatility of 12.80% compared to Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) at 7.53%. This indicates that VTLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vital Energy Inc. and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.