VTLE vs. FANG
Compare and contrast key facts about Vital Energy Inc. (VTLE) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VTLE or FANG.
Key characteristics
| VTLE | FANG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -33.17% | 22.14% |
| 1Y Return | -35.43% | 21.58% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -24.71% | 24.76% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -8.68% | 24.03% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -21.81% | 12.92% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.85 | 0.79 |
| Sortino Ratio | -1.12 | 1.24 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.87 | 1.16 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.36 | 1.13 |
| Martin Ratio | -1.27 | 2.99 |
| Ulcer Index | 27.28% | 7.22% |
| Daily Std Dev | 40.72% | 27.32% |
| Max Drawdown | -98.99% | -88.72% |
| Current Drawdown | -95.47% | -12.56% |
Fundamentals
| VTLE | FANG | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.16B | $52.53B |
| EPS | $15.09 | $17.33 |
| PE Ratio | 2.01 | 10.38 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $1.86B | $9.57B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $907.08M | $6.02B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $1.19B | $6.51B |
Correlation
The correlation between VTLE and FANG is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
VTLE vs. FANG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, VTLE achieves a -33.17% return, which is significantly lower than FANG's 22.14% return. Over the past 10 years, VTLE has underperformed FANG with an annualized return of -21.81%, while FANG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.92% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VTLE vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vital Energy Inc. (VTLE) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VTLE vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison
VTLE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.40%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTLE Vital Energy Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 4.55% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% |
Drawdowns
VTLE vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTLE drawdown since its inception was -98.99%, which is greater than FANG's maximum drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTLE and FANG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VTLE vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison
Vital Energy Inc. (VTLE) has a higher volatility of 12.83% compared to Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) at 7.82%. This indicates that VTLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
VTLE vs. FANG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vital Energy Inc. and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities