PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VTLE vs. FANG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

VTLE vs. FANG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Vital Energy Inc. (VTLE) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG).

Performance

VTLE vs. FANG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vital Energy Inc. (VTLE) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VTLE vs. FANG - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTLE
Vital Energy Inc.		0.00%-42.04%-32.03%-11.53%-14.49%205.23%-65.68%-20.72%-65.88%-24.96%
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.		32.36%-5.64%10.35%19.66%35.34%127.51%-46.00%0.92%-26.35%24.93%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VTLE:

$677.39M

FANG:

$56.53B

EPS

VTLE:

-$34.79

FANG:

$5.75

PS Ratio

VTLE:

0.36

FANG:

3.82

PB Ratio

VTLE:

0.39

FANG:

1.53

Total Revenue (TTM)

VTLE:

$1.90B

FANG:

$14.98B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VTLE:

$839.10M

FANG:

$7.48B

EBITDA (TTM)

VTLE:

-$213.73M

FANG:

$7.31B

Returns By Period

VTLE

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

FANG

1D
-0.43%
1M
14.30%
YTD
32.36%
6M
40.00%
1Y
27.09%
3Y*
17.80%
5Y*
24.65%
10Y*
12.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vital Energy Inc.

Diamondback Energy, Inc.

Often compared with VTLE:
VTLE vs. IMOVTLE vs. PBFVTLE vs. VOOVTLE vs. XLEVTLE vs. APA
Often compared with FANG:
FANG vs. QQQFANG vs. CVXFANG vs. DVNFANG vs. VNOMFANG vs. CL=FFANG vs. AOSFANG vs. APA

Return for Risk

VTLE vs. FANG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VTLE
FANG
FANG Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FANG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FANG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FANG Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FANG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FANG Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTLE vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vital Energy Inc. (VTLE) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VTLE vs. FANG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

VTLEFANGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

—

0.70

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.65

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.26

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

—

0.47

—

Correlation

The correlation between VTLE and FANG is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

VTLE vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison

VTLE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
VTLE
Vital Energy Inc.		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.		2.05%2.66%5.06%5.15%6.55%1.62%3.10%0.74%0.40%

Drawdowns

VTLE vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

VTLEFANGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

—

-88.72%

—

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-26.16%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-42.10%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-88.72%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

—

-2.18%

—

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

—

-19.58%

—

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

10.33%

—

Volatility

VTLE vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

VTLEFANGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

7.09%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

20.54%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

—

39.07%

—

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

—

38.63%

—

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

—

48.95%

—

Financials

VTLE vs. FANG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vital Energy Inc. and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
420.83M
3.38B
(VTLE) Total Revenue
(FANG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items