VT vs. BNDW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) and BNDW (Vanguard Total World Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while BNDW is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted Composite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VT returned 10.99%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for BNDW. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VT charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for BNDW.

Performance

VT vs. BNDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 12.24% return, which is significantly higher than BNDW's 0.42% return.

VT

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 4.91%
• YTD: 12.24%
• 6M: 13.14%
• 1Y: 29.24%
• 3Y*: 20.93%
• 5Y*: 10.99%
• 10Y*: 12.74%

BNDW

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 0.42%
• 6M: 0.18%
• 1Y: 3.51%
• 3Y*: 3.99%
• 5Y*: 0.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VT vs. BNDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	12.24%	22.43%	16.49%	22.02%	-18.00%	18.27%	16.59%	26.81%	-11.62%
BNDW Vanguard Total World Bond ETF	0.42%	5.02%	2.42%	7.18%	-12.88%	-2.10%	6.22%	8.37%	1.21%

Correlation

The correlation between VT and BNDW is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2018	0.12

Over the past year, VT and BNDW have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.

VT vs. BNDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VT	BNDW
Technology	27.8%	100.0%
Financial Services	15.9%	-
Industrials	12.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	-
Communication Services	8.3%	-
Healthcare	8.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	-
Energy	4.3%	-
Basic Materials	4.2%	-
Utilities	2.7%	-
Real Estate	2.4%	-

Return for Risk

VT vs. BNDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 67
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 67
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 71

BNDW

BNDW Risk / Return Rank: 27
BNDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
BNDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
BNDW Omega Ratio Rank: 26
BNDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
BNDW Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VT vs. BNDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VT	BNDW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	1.05	+1.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	1.50	+1.71
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.18	+0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	1.31	+1.73
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.53	3.70	+9.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VT vs. BNDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VT Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the BNDW Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VT and BNDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VT	BNDW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.31	1.05	+1.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	0.04	+0.65
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.37	+0.06

Drawdowns

VT vs. BNDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than BNDW's maximum drawdown of -17.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and BNDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	VT	BNDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.27%	-17.22%	-33.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.67%	-2.70%	-6.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.51%	-4.27%	-12.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.38%	-16.93%	-9.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.88%	-1.53%	+0.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.02%	-4.98%	-2.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.17%	0.95%	+1.22%

Volatility

VT vs. BNDW - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) at 1.31%. This indicates that VT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VT	BNDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.83%	1.31%	+2.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.17%	2.62%	+7.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.70%	3.36%	+9.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.05%	5.21%	+10.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.23%	4.90%	+12.33%

VT vs. BNDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDW's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VT vs. BNDW - Dividend Comparison

VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than BNDW's 4.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BNDW Vanguard Total World Bond ETF	4.21%	4.12%	3.90%	3.73%	2.02%	2.58%	1.56%	3.05%	1.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.59%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VT and BNDW in my portfolio?

VT and BNDW have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VT or BNDW?

VT has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to BNDW (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs BNDW's -17.22%.

Which ETF is better, VT or BNDW?

On 5-year performance, VT leads with 10.99% vs 0.22% for BNDW. On fees, BNDW is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, BNDW has been the lower-risk option at 1.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VT or BNDW?

Over the 5-year period, VT has performed better with a 10.99% return vs 0.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VT or BNDW?

BNDW is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VT or BNDW?

BNDW has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 1.59% for VT.

What is the main difference between VT and BNDW?

VT is categorized as Global Equities, while BNDW is Global Bonds. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while BNDW tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted Composite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.05% for BNDW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.