VSTCX vs. FNDA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VSTCX (Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund) and FNDA (Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, VSTCX returned 12.71%/yr vs 10.87%/yr for FNDA. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VSTCX charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDA.

Performance

VSTCX vs. FNDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund (VSTCX) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSTCX achieves a 18.22% return, which is significantly higher than FNDA's 14.87% return. Over the past 10 years, VSTCX has outperformed FNDA with an annualized return of 12.71%, while FNDA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.87% annualized return.

VSTCX

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 3.68%
• YTD: 18.22%
• 6M: 18.42%
• 1Y: 41.82%
• 3Y*: 22.14%
• 5Y*: 11.88%
• 10Y*: 12.71%

FNDA

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: 2.29%
• YTD: 14.87%
• 6M: 14.27%
• 1Y: 30.96%
• 3Y*: 15.77%
• 5Y*: 7.06%
• 10Y*: 10.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSTCX vs. FNDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VSTCX Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund	18.22%	15.20%	15.40%	21.34%	-13.00%	33.53%	8.38%	22.18%	-11.87%	9.21%
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF	14.87%	7.44%	9.00%	20.29%	-14.83%	31.12%	8.44%	24.34%	-12.12%	12.68%

Correlation

The correlation between VSTCX and FNDA is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013	0.97

The correlation between VSTCX and FNDA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

VSTCX vs. FNDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VSTCX	FNDA
Financial Services	18.3%	14.6%
Industrials	16.1%	18.9%
Technology	14.9%	14.9%
Healthcare	14.1%	6.8%
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	12.2%
Real Estate	6.5%	9.9%
Energy	6.2%	6.2%
Basic Materials	5.2%	5.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	4.2%
Communication Services	2.4%	4.1%
Utilities	2.3%	2.8%

Return for Risk

VSTCX vs. FNDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSTCX

VSTCX Risk / Return Rank: 78
VSTCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
VSTCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
VSTCX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
VSTCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
VSTCX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

FNDA

FNDA Risk / Return Rank: 56
FNDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
FNDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FNDA Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FNDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FNDA Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSTCX vs. FNDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund (VSTCX) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VSTCX	FNDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	1.82	+0.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.47	2.63	+0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.32	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.44	3.32	+2.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.17	10.73	+8.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VSTCX vs. FNDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSTCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the FNDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSTCX and FNDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VSTCX	FNDA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.50	1.82	+0.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.34	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	0.49	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.49	-0.11

Drawdowns

VSTCX vs. FNDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSTCX drawdown since its inception was -62.50%, which is greater than FNDA's maximum drawdown of -44.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSTCX and FNDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	VSTCX	FNDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.50%	-44.64%	-17.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.08%	-9.36%	+1.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.47%	-25.92%	-1.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.47%	-25.92%	-1.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.08%	-44.64%	-3.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.01%	+1.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.65%	-6.69%	-3.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.29%	2.89%	-0.60%

Volatility

VSTCX vs. FNDA - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund (VSTCX) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) have volatilities of 4.49% and 4.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VSTCX	FNDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.49%	4.38%	+0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.97%	11.79%	+0.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.57%	17.13%	+0.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.99%	20.89%	+1.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.47%	22.37%	+1.10%

VSTCX vs. FNDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSTCX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDA's 0.25% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VSTCX vs. FNDA - Dividend Comparison

VSTCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.38%, more than FNDA's 1.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF	1.09%	1.22%	1.53%	1.37%	1.38%	1.15%	1.31%	1.38%	1.64%	1.30%	1.18%	1.33%
VSTCX Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund	6.38%	7.55%	9.66%	2.50%	7.44%	19.92%	1.24%	4.14%	11.74%	5.76%	1.35%	2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VSTCX and FNDA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, VSTCX and FNDA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, VSTCX or FNDA?

VSTCX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to FNDA (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSTCX dropped -62.50% vs FNDA's -44.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VSTCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.