PortfoliosLab logo
VST vs. ED
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between VST and ED is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

VST vs. ED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vistra Corp. (VST) and Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%500.00%1,000.00%1,500.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1,096.06%
101.51%
VST
ED

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

VST:

0.80

ED:

0.75

Sortino Ratio

VST:

1.55

ED:

1.31

Omega Ratio

VST:

1.22

ED:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

VST:

1.45

ED:

0.92

Martin Ratio

VST:

3.27

ED:

2.21

Ulcer Index

VST:

21.64%

ED:

7.22%

Daily Std Dev

VST:

75.41%

ED:

19.25%

Max Drawdown

VST:

-53.32%

ED:

-74.02%

Current Drawdown

VST:

-26.44%

ED:

-4.90%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VST:

$47.38B

ED:

$39.46B

EPS

VST:

$7.01

ED:

$5.41

PE Ratio

VST:

19.87

ED:

20.24

PEG Ratio

VST:

3.76

ED:

3.78

PS Ratio

VST:

2.71

ED:

2.50

PB Ratio

VST:

15.09

ED:

1.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

VST:

$14.17B

ED:

$15.78B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VST:

$6.69B

ED:

$8.87B

EBITDA (TTM)

VST:

$6.21B

ED:

$5.66B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VST achieves a 2.38% return, which is significantly lower than ED's 21.84% return.


VST

YTD

2.38%

1M

37.89%

6M

4.16%

1Y

59.29%

5Y*

53.40%

10Y*

N/A

ED

YTD

21.84%

1M

1.60%

6M

12.37%

1Y

14.28%

5Y*

11.84%

10Y*

9.73%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

VST vs. ED — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VST is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VST is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VST is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VST is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VST is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VST is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

ED
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ED is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ED is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ED is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ED is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ED is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ED is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

VST vs. ED - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vistra Corp. (VST) and Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current VST Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the ED Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VST and ED, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.002.004.006.008.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.80
0.75
VST
ED

Dividends

VST vs. ED - Dividend Comparison

VST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than ED's 3.10% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
VST
Vistra Corp.
0.63%0.63%2.13%3.12%2.64%2.75%2.17%0.00%0.00%14.97%0.00%0.00%
ED
Consolidated Edison, Inc.
3.10%3.72%3.56%3.32%3.63%4.23%3.27%3.74%3.25%3.64%4.05%3.82%

Drawdowns

VST vs. ED - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VST drawdown since its inception was -53.32%, smaller than the maximum ED drawdown of -74.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VST and ED. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-26.44%
-4.90%
VST
ED

Volatility

VST vs. ED - Volatility Comparison

Vistra Corp. (VST) has a higher volatility of 21.72% compared to Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) at 6.27%. This indicates that VST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
21.72%
6.27%
VST
ED

Financials

VST vs. ED - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vistra Corp. and Consolidated Edison, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
4.04B
4.80B
(VST) Total Revenue
(ED) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

VST vs. ED - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Vistra Corp. and Consolidated Edison, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-60.0%-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
39.6%
54.9%
(VST) Gross Margin
(ED) Gross Margin
VST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Vistra Corp. reported a gross profit of 1.60B and revenue of 4.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.

ED - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Consolidated Edison, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.64B and revenue of 4.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.9%.

VST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Vistra Corp. reported an operating income of 599.00M and revenue of 4.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.8%.

ED - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Consolidated Edison, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 4.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.5%.

VST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Vistra Corp. reported a net income of 441.00M and revenue of 4.04B, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.

ED - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Consolidated Edison, Inc. reported a net income of 791.00M and revenue of 4.80B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.