PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSIIX vs. IMCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSIIX vs. IMCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSIIX) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSIIX achieves a 16.66% return, which is significantly lower than IMCG's 21.28% return. Over the past 10 years, VSIIX has underperformed IMCG with an annualized return of 10.75%, while IMCG has yielded a comparatively higher 14.19% annualized return.


VSIIX

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.56%
6M
9.86%
YTD
16.66%
1Y
27.67%
3Y*
14.40%
5Y*
9.75%
10Y*
10.75%
ALL TIME*
10.10%

IMCG

1D
1.55%
1M
-0.71%
6M
17.16%
YTD
21.28%
1Y
21.14%
3Y*
17.48%
5Y*
7.27%
10Y*
14.19%
ALL TIME*
11.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.17M$8.87M$8.86M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VSIIX vs. IMCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSIIX
Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
16.66%9.10%11.37%17.06%-9.31%28.12%5.81%22.81%-12.24%11.80%
IMCG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
21.28%6.55%18.14%20.73%-25.79%15.39%45.64%35.70%-3.68%25.57%

Correlation

The correlation between VSIIX and IMCG is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2004

0.83

The correlation between VSIIX and IMCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSIIX vs. IMCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VSIIX
VSIIX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VSIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VSIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

IMCG
IMCG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IMCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCG Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCG Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VSIIX vs. IMCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSIIX) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VSIIXIMCGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.22

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

2.09

+0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.70

7.86

+2.84

VSIIX vs. IMCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSIIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the IMCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSIIX and IMCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VSIIX vs. IMCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSIIX drawdown since its inception was -62.05%, which is greater than IMCG's maximum drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSIIX and IMCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSIIXIMCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.05%

-58.96%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-10.17%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.09%

-21.92%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.09%

-35.08%

+10.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.38%

-35.08%

-10.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-1.75%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.47%

-9.17%

+0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

2.70%

-0.29%

Volatility

VSIIX vs. IMCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSIIX) is 3.33%, while iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) has a volatility of 3.82%. This indicates that VSIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSIIXIMCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

3.82%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.26%

14.02%

-3.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.92%

16.91%

-1.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.56%

20.38%

-0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.75%

20.56%

+1.19%

VSIIX vs. IMCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VSIIX and IMCG have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VSIIX vs. IMCG - Dividend Comparison

VSIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than IMCG's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMCG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.62%0.78%0.78%0.85%0.91%0.41%0.09%0.30%0.35%0.45%0.52%0.38%
VSIIX
Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.77%1.96%1.99%2.10%2.04%1.76%1.69%2.07%2.36%1.80%1.77%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSIIX and IMCG have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMCG has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to VSIIX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSIIX dropped -62.05% vs IMCG's -58.96%.

VSIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSIIX and IMCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer