PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSCGX vs. VBTLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSCGX vs. VBTLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund (VSCGX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBTLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSCGX achieves a 5.65% return, which is significantly higher than VBTLX's 0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, VSCGX has outperformed VBTLX with an annualized return of 6.62%, while VBTLX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.58% annualized return.


VSCGX

1D
0.17%
1M
2.69%
YTD
5.65%
6M
5.96%
1Y
14.61%
3Y*
12.39%
5Y*
5.61%
10Y*
6.62%

VBTLX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.55%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.35%
1Y
5.34%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
0.21%
10Y*
1.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSCGX vs. VBTLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSCGX
Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund
5.65%12.87%11.65%12.72%-15.00%6.04%11.51%15.69%-2.95%10.02%
VBTLX
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Admiral Shares
0.42%7.17%1.26%5.74%-13.16%-1.81%7.72%8.73%-0.25%3.56%

Correlation

The correlation between VSCGX and VBTLX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2001

0.11

Over the past year, VSCGX and VBTLX have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSCGX vs. VBTLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSCGX
VSCGX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VSCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VSCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

VBTLX
VBTLX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
VBTLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBTLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBTLX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
VBTLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBTLX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSCGX vs. VBTLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund (VSCGX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBTLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSCGXVBTLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.24

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

1.86

+0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.45

5.58

+6.87

VSCGX vs. VBTLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSCGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the VBTLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSCGX and VBTLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSCGXVBTLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

1.36

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.04

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.32

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.76

+0.09

Drawdowns

VSCGX vs. VBTLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSCGX drawdown since its inception was -30.62%, which is greater than VBTLX's maximum drawdown of -18.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSCGX and VBTLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSCGXVBTLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.62%

-18.81%

-11.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.19%

-2.89%

-2.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.71%

-6.00%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.15%

-18.14%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.15%

-18.81%

-1.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.18%

+2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.00%

-2.67%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.18%

0.96%

+0.22%

Volatility

VSCGX vs. VBTLX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund (VSCGX) has a higher volatility of 2.17% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBTLX) at 1.38%. This indicates that VSCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBTLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSCGXVBTLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.17%

1.38%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.09%

2.80%

+2.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.16%

3.97%

+2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.70%

6.01%

+1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.37%

4.98%

+2.39%

VSCGX vs. VBTLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSCGX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VBTLX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VSCGX vs. VBTLX - Dividend Comparison

VSCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.24%, more than VBTLX's 3.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VBTLX
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Admiral Shares
3.98%3.87%3.69%3.10%2.59%1.96%2.39%2.74%2.57%2.56%2.53%2.82%
VSCGX
Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund
5.24%5.50%11.03%5.23%2.79%4.18%3.28%2.62%3.81%1.65%2.43%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSCGX and VBTLX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSCGX has higher volatility (2.17%) compared to VBTLX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSCGX dropped -30.62% vs VBTLX's -18.81%.

VSCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSCGX and VBTLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer