VSCAX vs. VTWG
VSCAX (Invesco Small Cap Value Fund) and VTWG (Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF) are both funds - VSCAX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Invesco, while VTWG is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Growth Index. Over the past 10 years, VSCAX returned 18.23%/yr vs 12.14%/yr for VTWG. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VSCAX charges 1.12%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VTWG.
Performance
VSCAX vs. VTWG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VSCAX achieves a 28.92% return, which is significantly higher than VTWG's 20.68% return. Over the past 10 years, VSCAX has outperformed VTWG with an annualized return of 18.23%, while VTWG has yielded a comparatively lower 12.14% annualized return.
VSCAX
- 1D
- -3.03%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 28.92%
- 6M
- 26.42%
- 1Y
- 54.44%
- 3Y*
- 31.41%
- 5Y*
- 19.66%
- 10Y*
- 18.23%
VTWG
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 4.58%
- YTD
- 20.68%
- 6M
- 16.99%
- 1Y
- 38.16%
- 3Y*
- 19.42%
- 5Y*
- 5.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
VSCAX vs. VTWG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VSCAX Invesco Small Cap Value Fund | 28.92% | 17.70% | 24.54% | 22.84% | 4.31% | 36.34% | 10.81% | 32.02% | -25.64% | 18.17% |
VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 20.68% | 13.07% | 15.15% | 18.90% | -26.49% | 2.84% | 34.72% | 28.75% | -9.45% | 22.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between VSCAX and VTWG is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010 | 0.83 |
The correlation between VSCAX and VTWG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VSCAX vs. VTWG — Risk / Return Rank
VSCAX
VTWG
VSCAX vs. VTWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Small Cap Value Fund (VSCAX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VSCAX | VTWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.28 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.98 | 2.58 | +2.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.30 | 9.25 | +8.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VSCAX vs. VTWG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSCAX drawdown since its inception was -57.77%, which is greater than VTWG's maximum drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSCAX and VTWG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VSCAX | VTWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.77% | -42.07% | -15.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -14.88% | +3.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.29% | -28.58% | +3.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.29% | -40.49% | +15.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.77% | -42.07% | -15.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.03% | -1.25% | -1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.88% | -10.50% | +1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 4.14% | -0.86% |
Volatility
VSCAX vs. VTWG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Small Cap Value Fund (VSCAX) has a higher volatility of 9.45% compared to Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) at 7.76%. This indicates that VSCAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VSCAX | VTWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.45% | 7.76% | +1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.31% | 16.86% | +0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.98% | 22.32% | -0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.35% | 24.67% | -1.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.73% | 24.27% | +2.46% |
VSCAX vs. VTWG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSCAX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWG's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
VSCAX vs. VTWG - Dividend Comparison
VSCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.15%, more than VTWG's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VSCAX Invesco Small Cap Value Fund | 7.15% | 9.22% | 7.90% | 4.93% | 10.12% | 16.90% | 0.30% | 2.53% | 28.45% | 16.65% | 1.71% | 11.08% |
VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 0.59% | 0.64% | 0.55% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.54% | 0.48% | 0.72% | 0.72% | 0.64% | 0.96% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VSCAX and VTWG have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VSCAX has higher volatility (9.45%) compared to VTWG (7.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSCAX dropped -57.77% vs VTWG's -42.07%.
VSCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VSCAX and VTWG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer