VRTTX vs. FDGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Russell 3000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTTX) and Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX).
VRTTX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Nov 1, 2010. FDGRX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
VRTTX vs. FDGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VRTTX vs. FDGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VRTTX Vanguard Russell 3000 Index Fund Institutional Shares | -6.72% | 16.70% | 23.72% | 25.92% | -19.27% | 25.48% | 20.81% | 31.03% | -5.29% | 21.02% |
FDGRX Fidelity Growth Company Fund | -6.86% | 18.54% | 37.18% | 47.25% | -33.86% | 22.57% | 67.42% | 38.40% | -4.14% | 36.76% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VRTTX having a -6.72% return and FDGRX slightly lower at -6.86%. Over the past 10 years, VRTTX has underperformed FDGRX with an annualized return of 13.20%, while FDGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.82% annualized return.
VRTTX
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -7.70%
- YTD
- -6.72%
- 6M
- -4.50%
- 1Y
- 14.62%
- 3Y*
- 16.53%
- 5Y*
- 10.07%
- 10Y*
- 13.20%
FDGRX
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -8.22%
- YTD
- -6.86%
- 6M
- -6.92%
- 1Y
- 26.32%
- 3Y*
- 24.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.04%
- 10Y*
- 19.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VRTTX vs. FDGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VRTTX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FDGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
VRTTX vs. FDGRX — Risk / Return Rank
VRTTX
FDGRX
VRTTX vs. FDGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 3000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTTX) and Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VRTTX | FDGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 1.07 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.29 | 1.58 | -0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.23 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 1.49 | -0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.04 | 5.49 | -0.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VRTTX | FDGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 1.07 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.51 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.85 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.66 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between VRTTX and FDGRX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
VRTTX vs. FDGRX - Dividend Comparison
VRTTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, while FDGRX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VRTTX Vanguard Russell 3000 Index Fund Institutional Shares | 1.19% | 0.82% | 1.20% | 1.49% | 1.54% | 1.12% | 1.38% | 1.72% | 1.96% | 1.69% | 1.89% | 1.91% |
FDGRX Fidelity Growth Company Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.86% | 3.83% | 7.20% | 10.67% | 8.86% | 3.84% | 6.38% | 4.73% | 6.16% | 3.92% |
Drawdowns
VRTTX vs. FDGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VRTTX drawdown since its inception was -34.96%, smaller than the maximum FDGRX drawdown of -71.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTTX and FDGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VRTTX | FDGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.96% | -71.62% | +36.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.38% | -13.07% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.13% | -40.25% | +15.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.96% | -40.25% | +5.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.87% | -12.60% | +3.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.07% | -15.97% | +11.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 3.89% | -1.34% |
Volatility
VRTTX vs. FDGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 3000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTTX) is 4.38%, while Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) has a volatility of 6.72%. This indicates that VRTTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VRTTX | FDGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.38% | 6.72% | -2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.30% | 14.66% | -5.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.38% | 24.34% | -5.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 23.90% | -6.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.38% | 23.29% | -4.91% |