PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRTS vs. MBIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VRTS vs. MBIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) and Merchants Bancorp (MBIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRTS achieves a -6.85% return, which is significantly lower than MBIN's 38.09% return.


VRTS

1D
1.15%
1M
8.29%
YTD
-6.85%
6M
-2.31%
1Y
-7.37%
3Y*
-5.80%
5Y*
-9.74%
10Y*
9.41%

MBIN

1D
1.32%
1M
0.67%
YTD
38.09%
6M
42.87%
1Y
50.12%
3Y*
25.28%
5Y*
11.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRTS vs. MBIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRTS
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.
-6.85%-22.12%-5.56%30.90%-33.50%38.98%82.52%56.62%-29.81%-1.79%
MBIN
Merchants Bancorp
38.09%-5.51%-13.59%77.01%-22.06%72.80%42.55%0.30%2.43%17.43%

Correlation

The correlation between VRTS and MBIN is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2017

0.47

The correlation between VRTS and MBIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VRTS:

$1.00B

MBIN:

$2.16B

EPS

VRTS:

$16.98

MBIN:

$4.97

PE Ratio

VRTS:

8.67

MBIN:

9.44

PS Ratio

VRTS:

1.27

MBIN:

1.63

PB Ratio

VRTS:

1.09

MBIN:

0.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

VRTS:

$799.77M

MBIN:

$1.32B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VRTS:

$646.06M

MBIN:

$423.13M

EBITDA (TTM)

VRTS:

$384.75M

MBIN:

$188.84M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRTS vs. MBIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRTS
VRTS Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
VRTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTS Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTS Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

MBIN
MBIN Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
MBIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBIN Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
MBIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBIN Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRTS vs. MBIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) and Merchants Bancorp (MBIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VRTSMBINDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.22

1.38

-1.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.08

1.99

-2.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.27

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

2.54

-2.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.39

5.71

-6.10

VRTS vs. MBIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRTS Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the MBIN Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRTS and MBIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VRTSMBINDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

1.38

-1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

0.33

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.49

-0.06

Drawdowns

VRTS vs. MBIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRTS drawdown since its inception was -74.36%, which is greater than MBIN's maximum drawdown of -53.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTS and MBIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRTSMBINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.36%

-53.77%

-20.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.95%

-18.94%

-20.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.59%

-43.94%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.50%

-43.94%

-11.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.87%

-9.11%

-37.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.45%

-19.93%

-11.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.17%

8.44%

+13.73%

Volatility

VRTS vs. MBIN - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) has a higher volatility of 9.74% compared to Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) at 6.16%. This indicates that VRTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRTSMBINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.74%

6.16%

+3.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.78%

27.09%

-1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.94%

36.50%

-2.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.83%

35.95%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.57%

40.23%

-1.66%

Dividends

VRTS vs. MBIN - Dividend Comparison

VRTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, more than MBIN's 0.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MBIN
Merchants Bancorp
0.87%1.17%0.99%0.75%1.15%0.76%1.16%1.42%1.20%0.25%0.00%0.00%
VRTS
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.
6.42%5.61%3.60%2.83%3.21%1.33%1.30%1.91%2.39%1.56%1.52%1.53%

Financials

VRTS vs. MBIN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. and Merchants Bancorp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M20222023202420252026
186.04M
270.51M
(VRTS) Total Revenue
(MBIN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

VRTS vs. MBIN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. and Merchants Bancorp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
70.9%
0
Portfolio components
VRTS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. reported a gross profit of 131.82M and revenue of 186.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.9%.

MBIN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Merchants Bancorp reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 270.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

VRTS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.23M and revenue of 186.04M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.8%.

MBIN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Merchants Bancorp reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 270.51M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

VRTS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. reported a net income of 7.13M and revenue of 186.04M, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.

MBIN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Merchants Bancorp reported a net income of 67.73M and revenue of 270.51M, resulting in a net margin of 25.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VRTS and MBIN have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRTS has higher volatility (9.74%) compared to MBIN (6.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRTS dropped -74.36% vs MBIN's -53.77%.

MBIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRTS and MBIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer