PortfoliosLab logo
VRTS vs. AGM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between VRTS and AGM is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

VRTS vs. AGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

VRTS:

-0.64

AGM:

0.38

Sortino Ratio

VRTS:

-0.69

AGM:

0.94

Omega Ratio

VRTS:

0.92

AGM:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

VRTS:

-0.39

AGM:

0.66

Martin Ratio

VRTS:

-1.04

AGM:

1.40

Ulcer Index

VRTS:

19.33%

AGM:

10.52%

Daily Std Dev

VRTS:

33.63%

AGM:

29.59%

Max Drawdown

VRTS:

-74.36%

AGM:

-94.63%

Current Drawdown

VRTS:

-39.88%

AGM:

-7.88%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VRTS:

$1.22B

AGM:

$2.04B

EPS

VRTS:

$16.84

AGM:

$16.32

PE Ratio

VRTS:

10.47

AGM:

11.99

PEG Ratio

VRTS:

0.62

AGM:

1.61

PS Ratio

VRTS:

1.35

AGM:

5.72

PB Ratio

VRTS:

1.37

AGM:

1.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

VRTS:

$900.74M

AGM:

$496.95M

Gross Profit (TTM)

VRTS:

$658.04M

AGM:

$405.52M

EBITDA (TTM)

VRTS:

$386.24M

AGM:

$469.32M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRTS achieves a -17.93% return, which is significantly lower than AGM's 0.57% return. Over the past 10 years, VRTS has underperformed AGM with an annualized return of 6.81%, while AGM has yielded a comparatively higher 23.60% annualized return.


VRTS

YTD

-17.93%

1M

16.33%

6M

-25.05%

1Y

-21.35%

5Y*

20.50%

10Y*

6.81%

AGM

YTD

0.57%

1M

15.25%

6M

-4.04%

1Y

11.03%

5Y*

32.13%

10Y*

23.60%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

VRTS vs. AGM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRTS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VRTS is 2020
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VRTS is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VRTS is 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VRTS is 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VRTS is 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VRTS is 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

AGM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AGM is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AGM is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AGM is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AGM is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AGM is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AGM is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

VRTS vs. AGM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current VRTS Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the AGM Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRTS and AGM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

VRTS vs. AGM - Dividend Comparison

VRTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, more than AGM's 2.90% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
VRTS
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.
4.90%3.60%2.83%3.21%1.33%1.30%1.91%2.39%1.56%1.52%1.53%0.53%
AGM
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation
2.90%2.84%2.30%3.37%2.84%4.31%3.35%3.84%1.84%1.82%2.03%1.85%

Drawdowns

VRTS vs. AGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRTS drawdown since its inception was -74.36%, smaller than the maximum AGM drawdown of -94.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTS and AGM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

VRTS vs. AGM - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) has a higher volatility of 10.62% compared to Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) at 6.88%. This indicates that VRTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

VRTS vs. AGM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20212022202320242025
217.93M
96.79M
(VRTS) Total Revenue
(AGM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items