VRTS vs. AGM
Compare and contrast key facts about Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VRTS or AGM.
Key characteristics
| VRTS | AGM | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -2.28% | -3.91% |
| 1Y Return | 40.04% | 40.11% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -1.69% | 24.88% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 18.49% | 24.59% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 4.71% | 23.52% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.27 | 1.27 |
| Daily Std Dev | 29.94% | 29.17% |
| Max Drawdown | -74.36% | -94.63% |
| Current Drawdown | -24.21% | -7.46% |
Fundamentals
| VRTS | AGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.64B | $1.89B |
| EPS | $16.61 | $16.41 |
| PE Ratio | 13.89 | 10.94 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.62 | 1.64 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $869.44M | $357.91M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $402.51M | $305.24M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $221.51M | $16.39M |
Correlation
The correlation between VRTS and AGM is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
VRTS vs. AGM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, VRTS achieves a -2.28% return, which is significantly higher than AGM's -3.91% return. Over the past 10 years, VRTS has underperformed AGM with an annualized return of 4.71%, while AGM has yielded a comparatively higher 23.52% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VRTS vs. AGM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VRTS vs. AGM - Dividend Comparison
VRTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, more than AGM's 2.58% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VRTS Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. | 3.14% | 2.83% | 3.21% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.91% | 2.39% | 1.56% | 1.52% | 1.53% | 0.53% | 0.00% |
AGM Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation | 2.58% | 2.30% | 3.37% | 2.84% | 4.31% | 3.35% | 3.84% | 1.84% | 1.82% | 2.03% | 1.85% | 1.40% |
Drawdowns
VRTS vs. AGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VRTS drawdown since its inception was -74.36%, smaller than the maximum AGM drawdown of -94.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTS and AGM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VRTS vs. AGM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) is 7.23%, while Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) has a volatility of 10.95%. This indicates that VRTS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
VRTS vs. AGM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities