VRT vs. STRL
Compare and contrast key facts about Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL).
Performance
VRT vs. STRL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VRT vs. STRL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 54.71% | 42.80% | 136.82% | 251.81% | -45.25% | 33.80% | 69.36% | 12.55% | -0.51% |
STRL Sterling Construction Company, Inc. | 32.99% | 81.79% | 91.57% | 168.08% | 24.71% | 41.32% | 32.17% | 29.29% | -16.87% |
Fundamentals
VRT:
$98.15B
STRL:
$12.69B
VRT:
$3.41
STRL:
$9.37
VRT:
73.44
STRL:
43.46
VRT:
0.32
STRL:
0.93
VRT:
13.32
STRL:
5.06
VRT:
24.90
STRL:
11.45
VRT:
$7.35B
STRL:
$2.49B
VRT:
$736.40M
STRL:
$572.31M
VRT:
$2.05B
STRL:
$479.85M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VRT achieves a 54.71% return, which is significantly higher than STRL's 32.99% return.
VRT
- 1D
- 6.98%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- YTD
- 54.71%
- 6M
- 66.20%
- 1Y
- 247.49%
- 3Y*
- 159.97%
- 5Y*
- 64.32%
- 10Y*
- —
STRL
- 1D
- 6.46%
- 1M
- -4.87%
- YTD
- 32.99%
- 6M
- 19.90%
- 1Y
- 259.75%
- 3Y*
- 120.71%
- 5Y*
- 77.46%
- 10Y*
- 54.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VRT vs. STRL — Risk / Return Rank
VRT
STRL
VRT vs. STRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VRT | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.97 | 4.39 | -0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.91 | 3.82 | +0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.52 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.60 | 8.08 | +1.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.88 | 23.59 | +4.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VRT | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.97 | 4.39 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | 1.54 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.23 | +0.74 |
Correlation
The correlation between VRT and STRL is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
VRT vs. STRL - Dividend Comparison
VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, while STRL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 0.08% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% |
STRL Sterling Construction Company, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
VRT vs. STRL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VRT drawdown since its inception was -71.24%, smaller than the maximum STRL drawdown of -92.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRT and STRL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VRT | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.24% | -92.51% | +21.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.78% | -31.02% | +6.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.24% | -47.67% | -23.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.26% | -11.41% | +2.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.47% | -46.56% | +30.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.53% | 10.62% | -2.09% |
Volatility
VRT vs. STRL - Volatility Comparison
Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL) have volatilities of 20.14% and 21.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VRT | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.14% | 21.20% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.36% | 46.74% | -1.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.91% | 59.69% | +3.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.08% | 50.46% | +10.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.59% | 50.44% | +4.15% |
Financials
VRT vs. STRL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vertiv Holdings Co. and Sterling Construction Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities