VRT vs. HUBB

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) and HUBB (Hubbell Incorporated) are both stocks. Both operate in the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 5 years, VRT returned 63.70%/yr vs 24.52%/yr for HUBB. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

VRT vs. HUBB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRT achieves a 96.57% return, which is significantly higher than HUBB's 15.49% return.

VRT

• 1D: -11.07%
• 1M: -2.77%
• YTD: 96.57%
• 6M: 91.55%
• 1Y: 173.44%
• 3Y*: 138.19%
• 5Y*: 63.70%
• 10Y*: —

HUBB

• 1D: -5.46%
• 1M: 7.68%
• YTD: 15.49%
• 6M: 12.49%
• 1Y: 30.76%
• 3Y*: 18.69%
• 5Y*: 24.52%
• 10Y*: 20.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRT vs. HUBB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	96.57%	42.80%	136.82%	251.81%	-45.25%	33.80%	69.36%	12.55%	1.03%
HUBB Hubbell Incorporated	15.49%	7.43%	28.94%	42.40%	15.08%	35.60%	8.89%	52.88%	-17.38%

Correlation

The correlation between VRT and HUBB is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2018	0.46

The correlation between VRT and HUBB shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.59 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap VRT : $124.82B HUBB : $27.19B
EPS VRT : $3.99 HUBB : $16.89
PE Ratio VRT : 79.86 HUBB : 30.19
PEG Ratio VRT : 0.35 HUBB : 1.26
PS Ratio VRT : 11.48 HUBB : 4.56
PB Ratio VRT : 29.41 HUBB : 7.19
Total Revenue (TTM) VRT : $10.84B HUBB : $6.00B
Gross Profit (TTM) VRT : $3.92B HUBB : $2.13B
EBITDA (TTM) VRT : $2.35B HUBB : $1.44B

Return for Risk

VRT vs. HUBB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRT

VRT Risk / Return Rank: 93
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 90
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

HUBB

HUBB Risk / Return Rank: 71
HUBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
HUBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
HUBB Omega Ratio Rank: 66
HUBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
HUBB Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRT vs. HUBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VRT	HUBB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.91	1.04	+1.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	1.54	+1.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.19	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.89	1.78	+5.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.18	4.61	+13.57

VRT vs. HUBB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRT Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is higher than the HUBB Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRT and HUBB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VRT vs. HUBB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRT drawdown since its inception was -71.24%, which is greater than HUBB's maximum drawdown of -41.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRT and HUBB.

Drawdown Indicators

	VRT	HUBB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.24%	-41.63%	-29.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.32%	-17.36%	-7.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-61.28%	-32.65%	-28.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-71.24%	-32.65%	-38.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.37%	-8.31%	-7.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.22%	-7.43%	-8.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.58%	6.70%	+2.88%

Volatility

VRT vs. HUBB - Volatility Comparison

Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a higher volatility of 20.96% compared to Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) at 11.17%. This indicates that VRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HUBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VRT	HUBB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.96%	11.17%	+9.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.74%	23.30%	+23.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.09%	29.62%	+30.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.33%	29.39%	+32.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.83%	28.90%	+25.93%

Dividends

VRT vs. HUBB - Dividend Comparison

VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than HUBB's 1.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
HUBB Hubbell Incorporated	1.09%	1.21%	1.19%	1.39%	1.82%	1.92%	2.37%	2.32%	3.17%	2.12%	2.22%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	0.07%	0.11%	0.10%	0.05%	0.07%	0.04%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

VRT vs. HUBB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Vertiv Holdings Co. and Hubbell Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

VRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.

HUBB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hubbell Incorporated reported a gross profit of 505.30M and revenue of 1.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.3%.

VRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.

HUBB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hubbell Incorporated reported an operating income of 263.80M and revenue of 1.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.

VRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.

HUBB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hubbell Incorporated reported a net income of 181.80M and revenue of 1.52B, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VRT and HUBB in my portfolio?

VRT and HUBB have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VRT or HUBB?

VRT has higher volatility (20.96%) compared to HUBB (11.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRT dropped -71.24% vs HUBB's -41.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.