VRP vs. QYLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD).
VRP and QYLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VRP is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Wells Fargo Hybrid and Preferred Securities Floating and Variable Rate Index. It was launched on May 1, 2014. QYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013. Both VRP and QYLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VRP or QYLD.
Performance
VRP vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VRP achieves a 11.43% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 16.42% return. Over the past 10 years, VRP has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 5.10%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.43% annualized return.
VRP
11.43%
1.00%
5.22%
15.71%
4.38%
5.10%
QYLD
16.42%
1.46%
9.29%
19.89%
7.37%
8.43%
Key characteristics
| VRP | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.45 | 1.92 |
| Sortino Ratio | 5.18 | 2.61 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.72 | 1.46 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.87 | 2.56 |
| Martin Ratio | 35.30 | 13.81 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.44% | 1.44% |
| Daily Std Dev | 4.56% | 10.35% |
| Max Drawdown | -46.04% | -24.75% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.03% | -1.44% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VRP vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
VRP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between VRP and QYLD is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VRP vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VRP vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
VRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, less than QYLD's 11.63% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VRP Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF | 5.86% | 6.61% | 5.38% | 4.26% | 4.18% | 5.15% | 5.28% | 4.68% | 5.10% | 5.02% | 3.04% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.63% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% | 10.74% |
Drawdowns
VRP vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VRP drawdown since its inception was -46.04%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRP and QYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VRP vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP) is 0.69%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that VRP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.