PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
VRP vs. QYLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


VRPQYLD
YTD Return11.47%18.06%
1Y Return17.76%22.66%
3Y Return (Ann)3.76%5.37%
5Y Return (Ann)4.42%7.67%
10Y Return (Ann)5.10%8.44%
Sharpe Ratio3.732.26
Sortino Ratio5.643.10
Omega Ratio1.781.55
Calmar Ratio3.062.93
Martin Ratio39.1516.14
Ulcer Index0.44%1.41%
Daily Std Dev4.65%10.05%
Max Drawdown-46.04%-24.89%
Current Drawdown0.00%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between VRP and QYLD is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

VRP vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, VRP achieves a 11.47% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 18.06% return. Over the past 10 years, VRP has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 5.10%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.44% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.01%
11.43%
VRP
QYLD

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VRP vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
Expense ratio chart for QYLD: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%
Expense ratio chart for VRP: current value at 0.50% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.50%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

VRP vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VRP
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VRP, currently valued at 3.73, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.003.73
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VRP, currently valued at 5.64, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.005.64
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VRP, currently valued at 1.78, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.78
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VRP, currently valued at 3.06, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.06
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VRP, currently valued at 39.15, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0039.15
QYLD
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for QYLD, currently valued at 2.26, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.26
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for QYLD, currently valued at 3.10, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.10
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for QYLD, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.55
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for QYLD, currently valued at 2.93, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.93
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for QYLD, currently valued at 16.14, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0016.14

VRP vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRP Sharpe Ratio is 3.73, which is higher than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRP and QYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.73
2.26
VRP
QYLD

Dividends

VRP vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

VRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, less than QYLD's 11.25% yield.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017201620152014
VRP
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF
5.92%6.61%5.38%4.26%4.18%5.15%5.28%4.68%5.10%5.02%3.04%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.25%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%10.74%

Drawdowns

VRP vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRP drawdown since its inception was -46.04%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRP and QYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember00
VRP
QYLD

Volatility

VRP vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP) is 1.16%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a volatility of 2.54%. This indicates that VRP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.16%
2.54%
VRP
QYLD