VRNS vs. COST

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VRNS (Varonis Systems, Inc.) and COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) are both stocks. VRNS operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while COST operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, VRNS returned 14.64%/yr vs 22.34%/yr for COST. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

VRNS vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Varonis Systems, Inc. (VRNS) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRNS achieves a 2.16% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 11.85% return. Over the past 10 years, VRNS has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 14.64%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 22.34% annualized return.

VRNS

• 1D: -6.61%
• 1M: 22.25%
• YTD: 2.16%
• 6M: 6.31%
• 1Y: -32.68%
• 3Y*: 8.16%
• 5Y*: -6.86%
• 10Y*: 14.64%

COST

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: -5.03%
• YTD: 11.85%
• 6M: 4.58%
• 1Y: -8.37%
• 3Y*: 25.00%
• 5Y*: 21.24%
• 10Y*: 22.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRNS vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VRNS Varonis Systems, Inc.	2.16%	-26.18%	-1.88%	89.14%	-50.92%	-10.56%	110.54%	46.90%	8.96%	81.16%
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation	11.85%	-5.39%	39.62%	49.00%	-19.05%	51.82%	32.67%	45.70%	10.60%	22.37%

Correlation

The correlation between VRNS and COST is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2014	0.23

The correlation between VRNS and COST shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS VRNS : -$1.16 COST : $26.51
PS Ratio VRNS : 5.97 COST : 1.09
Total Revenue (TTM) VRNS : $660.24M COST : $293.59B
Gross Profit (TTM) VRNS : $515.71M COST : $11.12B
EBITDA (TTM) VRNS : -$119.10M COST : $12.48B

Return for Risk

VRNS vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRNS

VRNS Risk / Return Rank: 24
VRNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
VRNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
VRNS Omega Ratio Rank: 24
VRNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
VRNS Martin Ratio Rank: 26

COST

COST Risk / Return Rank: 22
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 20
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRNS vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Varonis Systems, Inc. (VRNS) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VRNS	COST	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.48	-0.44	-0.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.18	-0.50	+0.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	0.94	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.48	-0.44	-0.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.77	-0.88	+0.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VRNS vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRNS Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is comparable to the COST Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRNS and COST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VRNS	COST	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.48	-0.44	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.13	0.94	-1.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31	1.02	-0.71
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.59	-0.45

Drawdowns

VRNS vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRNS drawdown since its inception was -78.19%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRNS and COST.

Drawdown Indicators

	VRNS	COST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.19%	-53.39%	-24.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-68.11%	-18.95%	-49.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-68.11%	-20.74%	-47.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-78.19%	-31.40%	-46.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-78.19%	-31.40%	-46.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.35%	-12.11%	-42.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.32%	-13.36%	-23.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	42.27%	9.86%	+32.41%

Volatility

VRNS vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Varonis Systems, Inc. (VRNS) has a higher volatility of 15.24% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 8.05%. This indicates that VRNS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VRNS	COST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.24%	8.05%	+7.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.38%	14.83%	+26.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.77%	19.12%	+48.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.77%	22.73%	+30.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.42%	21.95%	+25.47%

Dividends

VRNS vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

VRNS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation	0.56%	0.59%	0.49%	2.87%	0.76%	0.54%	3.38%	0.86%	1.08%	4.81%	1.09%	4.06%
VRNS Varonis Systems, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

VRNS vs. COST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Varonis Systems, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

VRNS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Varonis Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 131.56M and revenue of 173.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.0%.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -17.68B and revenue of 70.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -25.1%.

VRNS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Varonis Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of -44.48M and revenue of 173.13M, resulting in an operating margin of -25.7%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.82B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.

VRNS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Varonis Systems, Inc. reported a net income of -43.22M and revenue of 173.13M, resulting in a net margin of -25.0%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.19B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VRNS and COST in my portfolio?

VRNS and COST have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VRNS or COST?

VRNS has higher volatility (15.24%) compared to COST (8.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRNS dropped -78.19% vs COST's -53.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.44 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.